CGF - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: Army Bans PMAG? [打印本頁]

作者: 061084 時間: 28-5-2012 23:55 標題: Army Bans PMAG?

有冇人知係咩原因美軍要禁用PMAG?

http://www.military.com/daily-news/2012/05/25/in-reversal-army-bans-high-performance-rifle-mags.html?ESRC=eb.nl

作者: fay_927 時間: 29-5-2012 00:02

錢錢錢錢，錢錢錢錢

作者: rho837 時間: 29-5-2012 00:20

食人地飯碗裹啲飯要就住！打爆大哥大個飯碗咪同你死過鑼！有NSN又點！唔比麥砵你入場玩吹咩！鬼叫大佬啲G.I.夾有証呀！

作者: 051039 時間: 29-5-2012 21:56

為H&K護航！

作者: special_k 時間: 30-5-2012 00:19

It's probably TACOM hasn't test / don't care to test this piece of kit. So to be on the safe side they just put out this annoncement.
Who's behind this pulling strings, nobody would knows.
Typical army way of doing thing...

作者: sergeant3007 時間: 30-5-2012 13:46

其實係一件好事.

因為無得用PMAG, 美軍又多一樣嘢去賴.

例:
M16就賴長.
M4就賴唔夠打,
跟住M7A1, MK18..................
出來出去咪又係個種鎗.

作者: MG-42 時間: 4-6-2012 00:51

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: mk23 時間: 4-6-2012 09:49

PMAG/ EMAG 都有NSN no. 及附合STANAG 4179要求(Magpul網站有寫)
應該唔係好關事.
我想都係關錢多D...

作者: mlcvm 時間: 16-6-2012 16:28

帕d士兵拎上网卖......

作者: Rager 時間: 16-6-2012 18:29

呢次同ban 龍皮係一樣原理, 而家d contractor 簽左合約就要保障佢做獨市生意...
正如一d 學校嘅小學部為左保住一定生意額, 係合約寫明唔准學校自己set太多微波爐同放人出街食嘅道理一樣, $作怪

歡迎光臨 CGF (http://wargamehk.com/cgf/)