CGF - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 未來戰士 [打印本頁]

作者: JBL 時間: 21-7-2013 23:11 標題: 未來戰士

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: 蛇 時間: 22-7-2013 00:48

電腦病毒

藍畫面

作者: Hamlet 時間: 22-7-2013 00:59

引用:

原帖由蛇於 22-7-2013 00:48 發表
電腦病毒
藍畫面

咁要既野都用Windows？

作者: 蛇 時間: 22-7-2013 01:04

引用:

原帖由 Hamlet 於 2013-7-22 00:59 發表

咁要既野都用Windows？

用乜os 都有機會hang 機

作者: Stig 時間: 22-7-2013 01:12

圖中果隻唔係atlas, 係petman

atlas:

http://www.bostondynamics.com/robot_Atlas.html

petman:
http://www.bostondynamics.com/robot_petman.html

作者: Tango1997 時間: 22-7-2013 01:22

1粒50cal1隻

作者: cccarlos 時間: 22-7-2013 07:48

HKU bought one for the DARPA robotic charllenge, I was in the team programming it.

作者: 2slow 時間: 22-7-2013 09:08

引用:

原帖由 cccarlos 於 22-7-2013 07:48 發表
HKU bought one for the DARPA robotic charllenge, I was in the team programming it.

that's cool, you mean using the DRCsim?

作者: reniless 時間: 22-7-2013 11:32

其實唔係好明點解要整部兩腳步行式機械人，
其實多腳步行應該更靈活，係都要執著似個人型。

作者: 2slow 時間: 22-7-2013 11:39 標題: 回覆 9# 的帖子

同意師兄

細個好鐘意機械人、高達等等, 仲期望將來真係會實現
但依家諗真d, 人型既robot根本不切實際, 限制多多

作者: loveless 時間: 22-7-2013 11:40

引用:

原帖由 reniless 於 22-7-2013 11:32 發表
其實唔係好明點解要整部兩腳步行式機械人，
其實多腳步行應該更靈活，係都要執著似個人型。

人型較容易攞到開發資金.

.....人性的弱點.

作者: cccarlos 時間: 22-7-2013 12:04 標題: 回覆 8# 的帖子

Yes, I think they are gradually testing it on actual hardware now that they are being delivered. The actual ATLAS robot will be delivered sometime in August, and it will definitely make the headlines (if not somewhere in the newspaper obviously).

作者: cccarlos 時間: 22-7-2013 12:10 標題: 回覆 10# 的帖子

The main idea behind humanoid robots is their DIRECT COMPATIBILITY in working in human environments. The current DARPA (although a military body) robotics challenge, was supposedly motivated by the recent Japan nuclear disasters in their nuclear plants. Robots back then were essentially remote controlled tanks that can't even open a door. Yes, perhaps they can manoeuver better than bipedal creatures and offer better stability, but they can't do a dime in a human environment. We programme humanoid robots to do what humans do, for example driving a car (which involves it identifying a car, opening the bloody car door, sitting in there, knowing where the pedals and steering wheel are, knowing how to shift gears and manage traffic and terrain via its vision), opening a frigging door, picking up stuff and operating powered tools. These thus allow such humanoid robots to replace humans in hazardous working conditions: a collapsed nuclear plant, coal mines, etc..

作者: reniless 時間: 22-7-2013 12:20

引用:

原帖由 loveless 於 22-7-2013 11:40 發表

人型較容易攞到開發資金.

.....人性的弱點.

...人性的弱點。
咁我都想好似哥布拉咁，有個美女機械人傍住喺身邊。

作者: 2slow 時間: 22-7-2013 12:23

引用:

原帖由 cccarlos 於 22-7-2013 12:10 發表
The main idea behind humanoid robots is their DIRECT COMPATIBILITY in working in human environments. The current DARPA (although a military body) robotics challenge, was supposedly motivated by the re ...

ok I got the point, in fact I've read that before, operating a car, open a door and break thru walls are the tasks in the DARPA chanllenge as I recalled.

作者: loveless 時間: 22-7-2013 13:12

machines with human physics is like..... big tits.
you don't need them, they do more harm than good, but you want them anyway.

作者: rho837 時間: 22-7-2013 15:11

咁有了呢班機器人既CONCEPT! 由六十年代既日本仔乜乜鐵甲萬能夾.......乜乜金剛都可以從拍!

作者: sovietarmy2012 時間: 22-7-2013 19:40