CGF - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 咪7啦!賣件好野比你?! [打印本頁]

作者: sovietarmy2012 時間: 21-10-2013 12:57 標題: 咪7啦!賣件好野比你?!

http://hk.news.yahoo.com/%E6%B8% ... F%B4-224031630.html

咪7啦!賣件好野比你?!整古你就一定嫁啦

作者: tango10 時間: 21-10-2013 13:12

佢最先進的地方相信是能模仿人類拗柴的情況, 還要根據急救原則RICE去悉心處理. 還可以模擬被跌打的情況, 相當逼真啊!

作者: ranger_hk 時間: 21-10-2013 13:18

幫佢打石膏！！

作者: loveless 時間: 21-10-2013 13:20

軟件問題多過硬件值唔值o咼
你問我就一定話值.

不論醫學界學術界建築界乜界, 只要人地肯賣, 都應該要批出呢類經費.
我有個客, 原來響香港office收埋左成台nanoform CNC, 但美國點都唔俾入口中國, 所以中國o個邊既技術人員, 始終會在科技慢左幾拍, 因為人地擺明唔想俾你有競爭能力...

作者: sovietarmy2012 時間: 21-10-2013 13:56

引用:

原帖由 tango10 於 21-10-2013 13:12 發表
佢最先進的地方相信是能模仿人類拗柴的情況, 還要根據急救原則RICE去悉心處理. 還可以模擬被跌打的情況, 相當逼真啊!

笑能夠死人

好彩港大醫科勁

作者: sovietarmy2012 時間: 21-10-2013 14:05

引用:

原帖由 loveless 於 21-10-2013 13:20 發表
軟件問題多過硬件值唔值o咼
你問我就一定話值.

不論醫學界學術界建築界乜界, 只要人地肯賣, 都應該要批出呢類經費.
我有個客, 原來響香港office收埋左成台nanoform CNC, 但美國點都唔俾入口中國, 所以中國o個邊 ...

當然人地肯賣就當然要買...

不過...要買野的人亦要有番咁上下,國際高端產品,廿一世紀顯學,咁易賣比你而不做少少手腳.就當國務院同乜叉出口委員會發雞盲肯出口,亦難保件野你識用.
所以買同賣,原創同抄襲ge人,水平差距無咁大,尤其是高科技上.

港大的優勢係易D買野,不過要$同揾市場好難

作者: cccarlos 時間: 21-10-2013 14:31

this is my post on FB.

what certain media bodies are doing now, is feeding people with all the negative news about everything whilst disregarding the positive things to induce fear and sadness in the public. they can choose to report the fact that we ranked 9 (or 8?) out of 5x teams during the elimination rounds, with the first few being NASA JPL, MIT (not sure) and what not. they can also choose to report the fact that we have the skills to control the goddamn robot. Yet, they disregard all these, and simply wrote "不過斥資一千五百萬元購入的它仍笨手笨腳" as if they would be able to make it fly if they own it. First, I don't think they know what research means: if you experienced no challenges during your research you're plain lying. All that incident tells you is just that we broke a part, now we're sending it for repair. Yet they choose to say "hku spent so much money to create a joke that is embarrassing us all". Second, I don't think they even know how it works and what caused the failure, therefore being unable to depict it more suitably. Third, out of all the good pictures they get to choose when the robot succeeded to work, they chose the shittiest looking one, with suspected negative intentions. If you're writing news, hand me the facts, I will do the bloody evaluation myself.

作者: sovietarmy2012 時間: 21-10-2013 14:47

你吾覺報紙佬無正面野講過咩

作者: loveless 時間: 21-10-2013 15:09

1. The 6-foot (1.8 m) robot is designed for a variety of search and rescue tasks, and was unveiled to the public on July 11, 2013.

2. In 2013, DARPA program manager Gill Pratt compared the prototype version of Atlas to a small child, saying that "a 1-year-old child can barely walk, a 1-year-old child falls down a lot ... this is where we are right now."

3. In 2014, Atlas robots programmed by six different teams will compete in the DARPA Robotics Challenge. The contest was inspired by the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster, and carries a US$2 million prize for the winning team.

4. Additional funds are being allocated to a newly formed team of Team K and Case Western. That team, now known as HKU, will use an ATLAS robot generously donated to it by Hong Kong University to participate in the DRC Trials in December, 2013.
http://engg.hku.hk/home/robotics/hku.htm

Our academics will work with, and against, from the likes of MIT, NASA, Lockheed Martin, University of Kansas and much more, all in all the very pinnacle of robotic science.
So really, what the hell more do we want? We laugh and we snear just because the freaking thing falls? That's how we're supposed to learn for god's sake.
http://www.theroboticschallenge.org/Meet.aspx

作者: loveless 時間: 21-10-2013 16:19

如果我3分鐘找到資料，點解傳媒唔得？
因為正面既資料唔夠折墮

作者: cccarlos 時間: 21-10-2013 16:27 標題: 回覆 10# 的帖子

exactly sir

作者: sovietarmy2012 時間: 21-10-2013 16:34

引用:

原帖由 loveless 於 21-10-2013 16:19 發表
如果我3分鐘找到資料，點解傳媒唔得？
因為正面既資料唔夠折墮

也許3分鐘找到資料都懶

作者: loveless 時間: 21-10-2013 16:42

引用:

原帖由 sovietarmy2012 於 21-10-2013 16:34 發表

也許3分鐘找到資料都懶

唔會o架. 傳播系出身佢地好清楚所有為免揹鑊而無得避既步驟.

所以整個情況更加令人噁心:
佢地係選擇性去嘩眾取寵.
佢地係選擇性去愚化社會.

作者: sovietarmy2012 時間: 21-10-2013 16:57

我覺得佢地都係愚,同時去愚化社會

作者: rho837 時間: 21-10-2013 17:14

"講大"話 ! 我冇"7" ! "7" ! 都係班納稅人同讚助人"7"至麻.......

歡迎光臨 CGF (http://wargamehk.com/cgf/)