CGF - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 一枝glock,攪成咁,仲開唔開到槍??? [打印本頁]

作者: ZaMaR 時間: 12-1-2007 00:10 標題: 一枝glock,攪成咁,仲開唔開到槍???

如題

作者: Kane 時間: 12-1-2007 00:11

開到

作者: 怪物 時間: 12-1-2007 00:19

哇..
用wd40擦下佢啦..
之後再補槍油
點解會咁架....??

作者: ?老虎仔? 時間: 12-1-2007 00:20

就咁睇就無從判斷

[ 本帖最後由 ?老虎仔? 於 12-1-2007 00:22 編輯 ]

作者: 伯言 時間: 12-1-2007 00:24

真槍...

作者: ZaMaR 時間: 12-1-2007 00:25

引用:

原帖由伯言於 12-1-2007 00:24 發表
真槍...

終於有人留意到...[

]

作者: 蛇 時間: 12-1-2007 00:28

丟左落海一排撈返上黎0者...

作者: 忽必烈 時間: 12-1-2007 00:28

應該唔得啦....條彈弓都死了

作者: chrislau 時間: 12-1-2007 00:33

我估可以，但係好快玩完！[

]

作者: ?老虎仔? 時間: 12-1-2007 00:43

引用:

原帖由 ZaMaR 於 12-1-2007 00:25 發表

終於有人留意到...

下...一開始就睇出.....[:s]

作者: GTR 時間: 12-1-2007 01:04

用到
冇記錯好似係測試緊'金秀食'果d野

作者: ?老虎仔? 時間: 12-1-2007 01:08

見唔到發射組件, 點知開唔開到槍? [b3]

作者: Royal_9413 時間: 12-1-2007 01:11

引用:

原帖由 ?老虎仔? 於 12-1-2007 00:43 發表

下...一開始就睇出.....

你又唔出聲[

]

作者: WAIKO01 時間: 12-1-2007 03:34

不能,可能會炸膛.

作者: 14692 時間: 12-1-2007 05:34

引用:

原帖由 WAIKO01 於 12-1-2007 03:34 發表
不能,可能會炸膛.

係一定會

作者: guelph99 時間: 12-1-2007 09:20

發生咗嚴重災難??[:s]

作者: SiuPO1983 時間: 12-1-2007 09:56

冇
佢主人帶左佢去玩水姐

作者: qkraymond 時間: 12-1-2007 10:40

引用:

原帖由 SiuPO1983 於 12-1-2007 09:56 發表
冇
佢主人帶左佢去玩水姐

嘩 ! 咁激呀好玩唔玩耍水戰 !!!
[:s]

作者: law 時間: 12-1-2007 10:44

引用:

原帖由 qkraymond 於 12-1-2007 10:40 發表

嘩 ! 咁激呀好玩唔玩耍水戰 !!!

仲玩左好耐添!! [

]

作者: 高!高!高! 時間: 12-1-2007 14:21

我估......起碼可以打到第一發.......................[

]

作者: Boniface 時間: 12-1-2007 15:23

點開...我睇唔到呀!!!!!!!![:x]

作者: puredon 時間: 12-1-2007 16:47

睇唔到

作者: Royal_9413 時間: 12-1-2007 17:30

引用:

原帖由 高!高!高! 於 12-1-2007 14:21 發表
我估......起碼可以打到第一發.......................

一開槍就.................................

[ 本帖最後由 Royal_9413 於 12-1-2007 17:31 編輯 ]

作者: ZaMaR 時間: 12-1-2007 20:30

引用:

原帖由 Boniface 於 12-1-2007 15:23 發表
點開...我睇唔到呀!!!!!!!!

轉左區就冇左張圖.....[

]

作者: adrianyahk 時間: 12-1-2007 20:51

引用:

原帖由 ZaMaR 於 12-1-2007 20:30 發表

轉左區就冇左張圖.....

附件係呢兩幅圖ja?

作者: ZaMaR 時間: 12-1-2007 20:58

引用:

原帖由 adrianyahk 於 12-1-2007 20:51 發表

附件係呢兩幅圖ja?

一幅圖來的[:P]

作者: sunny 時間: 12-1-2007 22:54

引用:

原帖由 WAIKO01 於 12-1-2007 03:34 發表
不能,可能會炸膛.

I 'm 100% sure that it can 開到槍 and 不會膛炸.

作者: Paul 時間: 13-1-2007 02:46

好似以前見過呢個测試D其他相,
最後重開到鎗....

且USP就唔Pass同一個測試

作者: SoloWing_Pixy 時間: 13-1-2007 03:26

呢個我冇記錯係做緊抗海水侵蝕測試
之後把槍係100% work

作者: attacker2006 時間: 13-1-2007 09:55

我記得係放去係一個沙筒入面埋住佢,之後倒海水,得一段時間攞出黎做測試

作者: ZaMaR 時間: 13-1-2007 12:52

引用:

原帖由 SoloWing_Pixy 於 13-1-2007 03:26 發表
呢個我冇記錯係做緊抗海水侵蝕測試
之後把槍係100% work

個test佢地係洗晒d秀先開槍...我係想知就咁打唔打到....[:P]

作者: sunny 時間: 13-1-2007 22:40

引用:

原帖由 ZaMaR 於 13-1-2007 12:52 發表

個test佢地係洗晒d秀先開槍...我係想知就咁打唔打到....

打到[

]

作者: miehk117 時間: 26-1-2007 21:47

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: 莊家-犯罪無間 時間: 26-1-2007 22:47

引用:

原帖由 Royal_9413 於 12-1-2007 17:30 發表

一開槍就.................................

手槍式核彈[

]

作者: Henry 時間: 29-1-2007 08:05

引用:

原帖由 14692 於 12-1-2007 05:34 發表

係一定會

i disagree. glocks have like 4 moving parts on the slide, brush the barrel and you should be good to go. now will it jam? that's another story. but i'm sure it would fire.

i've seen guns in worse condition that still fire, and it's a Glock, they were built to be thrown around.

作者: 14692 時間: 29-1-2007 08:08 標題: 回覆 #35 Henry 的帖子

但係睇佢咁既銹漬.....有D危

作者: Henry 時間: 29-1-2007 08:20

um.. dude, i've seen mosin nagants in much worse conditions that still fire.
i've seen those mosin nagants with their barrels so corroded, you can't even SEE any rifling, and it still fires. is it safe? no, but will it shoot? HELL YEAH it wil

now, those mosins were firing full sized rifle cartraige, which contains 40-60more grains of gunpowder than a pistol cartraige. it has a barrel that looks like my drain pipe. the glock has polygonal rifling, which makes it easier to brush the barrel down, it's got much better steel and a polymer frame, minimal moving parts and it's proven with tests they do in austria. it passed the JSSAP test for 10,000(20,000?) rounds without cracking the slide and still functioning.

tell me it won't shoot. tell me it won't work. it might jam, but it will shoot

i may hate Glocks, but i respect them because they're so rediculously reliable.

作者: Henry 時間: 29-1-2007 08:51

to further prove my point, i'll post two photos of a 1911 that this guy had.
it's a US Property marked milspec 1911, date of manufacture and serial number are already indistinguishable. how do you think rust was like on this pistol? well, this is what the owner, John told me:

"Here are the photos of the US&S with all the pitting.. It shoots just
fine!!!!!!!!!

John"

true, it's not a Glock, but it's also a near 100 year old design on a pistol. Glocks are supposed to have excellent corrosion resistance, and they pride themselves for making firearms like that.

作者: HugoLaLaLa 時間: 29-1-2007 09:45

引用:

原帖由 Henry 於 29-1-2007 08:51 發表
to further prove my point, i'll post two photos of a 1911 that this guy had.
it's a US Property marked milspec 1911, date of manufacture and serial number are already indistinguishable. how do ...

嘩，型！！[

]
佢有無講係點rust出黎？

作者: sunny 時間: 29-1-2007 18:07

引用:

原帖由 14692 於 29-1-2007 08:08 發表
但係睇佢咁既銹漬.....有D危

Those are only surface rust jar wor.[

]

作者: 14692 時間: 30-1-2007 05:41

引用:

原帖由 sunny 於 29-1-2007 18:07 發表

Those are only surface rust jar wor.

影響機械結構...

作者: Henry 時間: 30-1-2007 16:29

引用:

原帖由 14692 於 30-1-2007 05:41 發表

影響機械結構...

have you ever field stripped a Glock?
then have you ever detail stripped a Glock?

those things are so simple it's rediculous. there's like 3 moving parts in the slide...
those guys throw them into sand water and let it sit for days then pull them out just to test fire them and they still don't jam.

it passed the JSSAP tests with flying colours man

作者: Paul 時間: 30-1-2007 23:12 標題: 回覆 #42 Henry 的帖子

所以如果我有鎗牌一定買Glock.........其中一個原因係方便洗鎗

作者: 14692 時間: 31-1-2007 05:43 標題: 回覆 #42 Henry 的帖子

我喺Vagas都燒過Glock, 亦拆過嚟玩, 但係相比之下, 226做完同樣test後會好過Glock

作者: Henry 時間: 31-1-2007 05:55

引用:

原帖由 14692 於 31-1-2007 05:43 發表
我喺Vagas都燒過Glock, 亦拆過嚟玩, 但係相比之下, 226做完同樣test後會好過Glock

i would trust a Glock anyday, but i still hate them every single day.

Sig's are much more user friendly and safe, that's why i have a Sig P225(single stack9mm).
M1911's are much more elegant and much much much more accurate, that why i have a 1911a1.

i don't think Glocks are pieces of crap, but i certainly don't prefer them.

作者: 14692 時間: 31-1-2007 06:16

引用:

原帖由 Henry 於 31-1-2007 05:55 發表

i would trust a Glock anyday, but i still hate them every single day.

Sig's are much more user friendly and safe, that's why i have a Sig P225(single stack9mm).
M1911's are much more e ...

各有各好, 百家爭鳴

作者: sunny 時間: 1-2-2007 02:53

引用:

原帖由 14692 於 30-1-2007 05:41 發表

影響機械結構...

作者: 14692 時間: 1-2-2007 05:29

引用:

原帖由 sunny 於 1-2-2007 02:53 發表

OK

你冇見過炸膛果吓.......

作者: sunny 時間: 1-2-2007 17:55

引用:

原帖由 14692 於 1-2-2007 05:29 發表

你冇見過炸膛果吓.......

Do u know what is surface rust sin?

作者: 14692 時間: 1-2-2007 22:35

知道又點, 始終浸過咸水......

作者: Henry 時間: 2-2-2007 03:22

引用:

原帖由 14692 於 1-2-2007 22:35 發表
知道又點, 始終浸過咸水......

i think you're underestimating the ability of these new pistols.
lets put this out there:
THEY DON'T FIRE 6MM PLASTIC BB'S

and they're certainly nothing like airsoft pistols.
i know it's a sig(i love sig's), but Glocks are no worse than sig's on reliability

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpl0ZJkikNA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kgjmtj9TgX8

[ 本帖最後由 Henry 於 2-2-2007 03:34 編輯 ]

作者: 14692 時間: 2-2-2007 05:22

呢個我明, 不過rusting得太緊要既話, 咩都死啦

作者: Henry 時間: 2-2-2007 07:16 標題: 回覆 #52 14692 的帖子

once again, did you see those 1911 pics i posted up? take a guess how the insides look like when just surface rust did that to the outside already.

the 1911 was rusted shut, the guy had to get a gunsmith to cut the side rails open and hammer the slide stop and the slide out when he just got done with it... and it still works.

作者: 14692 時間: 2-2-2007 09:46

引用:

原帖由 Henry 於 2-2-2007 07:16 發表
once again, did you see those 1911 pics i posted up? take a guess how the insides look like when just surface rust did that to the outside already.

the 1911 was rusted shut, the guy had to ge ...

我明你意思......美國佬$$多

作者: Henry 時間: 2-2-2007 10:11

引用:

原帖由 14692 於 2-2-2007 09:46 發表

我明你意思......美國佬$$多

how does that relate to being rich or not? finding a piece of relic that you would like to revive?

and on the other hand, the more you complain about other people being rich the less likely you'd be able to get rich

作者: 14692 時間: 2-2-2007 10:15

我係窮...

歡迎光臨 CGF (http://wargamehk.com/cgf/)