原帖由 rho837 於 11-6-2017 00:51 發表
班兵朋友講! 就算唔打穿架車都俾shockwave震死!
用V底車可以避免IDE!
用鋼刀架圍車身可以瀉火箭炮攻擊!
用Bushmaster APV可以防到幾下IDE! 不過車軸一定焠煉!
原帖由 rho837 於 11-6-2017 02:07 發表
幾年前朋友載我參觀過部BushMaster! 設計防地雷及IED! 就算炸中! 架車夠重唔會反車! 同時保護到車箱內班人!
有冷氣! 有冰水飲! 重有窗門望下出面環境至落車! 貨車咁渣! 車頭車尾可以加鏟或吊勺! 機械設計重有好多 ...
原帖由 rho837 於 11-6-2017 00:51 發表
班兵朋友講! 就算唔打穿架車都俾shockwave震死!
用V底車可以避免IDE!
用鋼刀架圍車身可以瀉火箭炮攻擊!
用Bushmaster APV可以防到幾下IDE! 不過車軸一定焠煉!
原帖由 Hamlet 於 11-6-2017 00:51 發表
第一張係,好似話佢係硬食152mm炮彈IED……當年伊拉克連M1A2都瀨過嘢唔好話佢
一般輪形裝甲車佢個防護要求係正面可以抵擋12.7mm普通彈 側面擋7.62 以及炮彈既彈片,但如果唔好彩俾炮彈直擊既話……
原帖由 rho837 於 11-6-2017 10:10 發表
講真! 世上有支Javelin! 乜嘢重裝甲都死!
不過支Javelin咁能貴! 係一定簡目標打! 一般裝甲車等食地雷!
裝甲車在入城及第三世界好有用!
一定現代化裝甲車! 如果將來有機會退休做工程兵入翻騎 ...
When the 30 APCs were secretly acquired in February 2016, ostensibly to help in the fight against interior terrorism and organised crime, experts questioned their safety following three incidents a few days into their use.
In the first case, the windscreen of one carrier was shattered in the middle of an operation.
In another case, security personnel complained that some APCs were leaking while others lacked proper ventilation to conduct operations in Coast and Northern Kenya.
In another incident, a group of General Service Unit personnel requested the suppliers to prove the vehicle's durability and efficiency in the filed.
The officers wanted the supplier to get into the APC and drive past them as they shot at it at close range.
"The supplier refused to get into the APC. He said he would not endanger his life by getting into the APC as we shot at it because it was not safe. We were all shocked," said an officer aware of the practice.
原帖由 sam524 於 11-6-2017 23:40 發表
IED衰就衰在係土製
根本唔會知佢玩咩火力 你幾厚甲 佢都可以加大火力
仲要IED係瞄住成架車最薄o既地方打
比得佢係你身邊爆 唔死都得番半條命
傳說Challenger 2試過係伊拉克食70幾粒RPG都無事
只係死engine 整 ...
原帖由 sam524 於 11-6-2017 23:40 發表
IED衰就衰在係土製
根本唔會知佢玩咩火力 你幾厚甲 佢都可以加大火力
仲要IED係瞄住成架車最薄o既地方打
比得佢係你身邊爆 唔死都得番半條命
傳說Challenger 2試過係伊拉克食70幾粒RPG都無事
只係死engine 整 ...
歡迎光臨 CGF (http://wargamehk.com/cgf/) | Powered by Discuz! 6.0.0 |