CGF - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 終於都......... [打印本頁]

作者: Medic_Don 時間: 8-1-2008 21:06 標題: 終於都.........

買左成兩个月，終於都tune好支RS 97式: 11.1V鋰電(3塊chewing gum sizes), 603 precision inner barrel, 7mm bearing, PDI 150%, 齒要執少少....

裝埋個copy 鏡......但唔知點換這个scope的電

，請問有冇師兄知呀

, Thanks !

我自已覺得此AEG的balance, biomechanic(人体力学

及weight都比 L85A2好....感覺好似靠式合亞洲人

[ 本帖最後由 Medic_Don 於 9-1-2008 14:06 編輯 ]

作者: SL1991 時間: 8-1-2008 21:33

前面膠蓋中間有條鐵向上拉起佢，然沒再向前推個膠蓋。

作者: Medic_Don 時間: 8-1-2008 21:35 標題: 回覆 #2 SL1991 的帖子

Thank you very much

作者: ODA-533 時間: 9-1-2008 01:06

Don...is it good for collection or in operation???
some of my frds are vy interesting

作者: Medic_Don 時間: 9-1-2008 14:18 標題: 回覆 #4 ODA-533 的帖子

Ha Ha

, as I personally keen on "bull-pups" rifle design very munh, as I think that it was the best design in terms of body mechanic, balance and efficiency in mobility (long barrel but short body), and this assault rifle was around 50% polymers and 50%metallic, made this rifle with reasonable light body weight but firm body skeleton, it's no doubt that I like this rifle more then L85 and P90 for the time being

provided TAVOR not market in AEG industry.........other good thing is we could use all our M16 AEG magazine without any problems.
But the disadvantage is that it's quite hard to find a right batteries to fit this rifle if you wish to upgrade it's power....and also you need to do something in tuning the bearing and wheels inside the gear box

if you seek for mechincally perfect during wargame

........if the prices could lower down to $2500, I think it would be more worth it, but for collection, it's no doubt that it's a must for me to keep in my AEG weapon stock especially if you really like such kind of rifle design

[ 本帖最後由 Medic_Don 於 9-1-2008 14:23 編輯 ]

作者: ODA-533 時間: 10-1-2008 21:43

thx u man !! bring it togather if u will join our game la !! hahhaa for us on site testing...

作者: louisli 時間: 11-1-2008 11:59

個人覺得呢個鏡唔係好襯...

作者: 里安 時間: 11-1-2008 15:28

個setting幾得別

中槍西鏡

唔錯唔錯

作者: pik825 時間: 11-1-2008 16:11

引用:

原帖由 louisli 於 11-1-2008 11:59 發表
個人覺得呢個鏡唔係好襯...

非常同意

作者: Medic_Don 時間: 11-1-2008 20:10

Actually, I still not figure out what kind of scope should be used by this assault rifle

, the idea of using this copy EOtech was just come out from some advertisement in RS AEG website

. Do any PLA experts in here know that which kind of scope should be used for this rife, I'm interested to know too...ha ha

May be this one is the right scope, but I still couldn't find this scope in HK:-

[img]http://www.realsword.com.hk/image/produ_97/97_15.jpg[/img

http://www.realsword.com.hk/gun_97.htm

[ 本帖最後由 Medic_Don 於 11-1-2008 20:21 編輯 ]

作者: Medic_Don 時間: 11-1-2008 22:02

引用:

原帖由里安於 11-1-2008 15:28 發表
個setting幾得別

中槍西鏡

唔錯唔錯

據未証實路邊社消息，5.56mm 97式是target外銷市塲，而5.8mm (7.62mm is wrong) 95式才是PLA用過喎

....用西鏡在外銷97真的好怪

......haha....我向來用鏡，最緊要是配合自己的戰術及瞄姿，外觀只是我第二考盧點

[ 本帖最後由 Medic_Don 於 11-1-2008 22:40 編輯 ]

作者: tango10 時間: 11-1-2008 22:31

九五該是5.8mm

個鏡都幾高.

作者: bigdick 時間: 11-1-2008 22:33

引用:

原帖由 Medic_Don 於 11-1-2008 22:02 發表

據未証實路邊社消息，5.56mm 97式是target外銷市塲，而7.62mm 95式才是PLA用過喎 ....用西鏡在外銷97真的好怪 ......haha....我向來用鏡，最緊要是配合自己的戰術及瞄姿，外觀只是我第二考盧點

Type 95 is cal 5.8, not 7.62

Yes, 97 is 5.56 and for export. One of the dealers in HK has some in stock.

The scope on the right in RS' pic set is the one adopted by the PLA

Here what I did to mine, the z-point. The line of sight is pretty high on the Type 97/95 so I try anything which is low profile, I also try the early version of the Bushnell RDS, looks interesting, will see if I can post pic later

The one above it is the rubber training version of the 95

作者: Medic_Don 時間: 11-1-2008 22:39 標題: 回覆 #13 bigdick 的帖子

You are right:-

http://world.guns.ru/assault/as39-e.htm

By the way, I still not sure what kind of sling is suitable for use in 97, what do you think? for example, 2 points, 3 points or 1 point sling

[ 本帖最後由 Medic_Don 於 11-1-2008 22:43 編輯 ]

作者: bigdick 時間: 12-1-2008 01:27

引用:

原帖由 Medic_Don 於 11-1-2008 22:39 發表
You are right:-
http://world.guns.ru/assault/as39-e.htm

By the way, I still not sure what kind of sling is suitable for use in 97, what do you think? for example, 2 points, 3 points or 1 po ...

haven't really try with other sling system, frankly, from my POV, the original sling attach to the rifle with a "not so user friendly position"...when you shoulder the butt to the pocket with the traditional way(sling over the shoulder), the sling and the hook gets into the way as they are so close to the butt plate and it is on the left side.

I notice that some PLA sling over their neck instead which I guess it gives some kind of advantage, but, when you do a long match with full gears, not really a joy I guess

BTW, not sure if you watch these TV series before, most of the production have the 97 & some 95 for shooting, you can find these DVD in HK, only 20 $ for set. I personally enjoy the 陸軍特戰隊 over the 垂直打擊, don't compare to those Hollywood production, the Mainland still has a long way to go...yet moving forward...

http://big5.cctv.com/gate/big5/tvguide.cctv.com/20070420/102671.shtml

http://big5.cctv.com/teleplay/special/C16852/index.shtml

Sorry for the off topic

cheers

作者: Medic_Don 時間: 12-1-2008 11:38 標題: 回覆 #15 bigdick 的帖子

Thanks for the intel

I really like this one:-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQjbaW3oC-Q

, especially the female PLA in white uniforms

[ 本帖最後由 Medic_Don 於 12-1-2008 12:56 編輯 ]

作者: bigdick 時間: 12-1-2008 23:17

引用:

原帖由 Medic_Don 於 12-1-2008 11:38 發表
Thanks for the intel

I really like this one:-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQjbaW3oC-Q

, especially the female PLA in white uniforms

you are welcome, always glad to know peoples who favorites the bullpup and also like the 97/95 (although there are still a lot aspects need to be improved in the design...)

yes, that PLA is cute

歡迎光臨 CGF (http://wargamehk.com/cgf/)