CGF - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 有冇人知,少年制服團體用槍....... [打印本頁]

作者: macross1911 時間: 20-5-2008 10:19 標題: 有冇人知,少年制服團體用槍.......

有冇人知,少年制服團體用槍,

如:航空 M16

航海 SA80

是真槍 or..........?

作者: B20_hk 時間: 20-5-2008 10:25 標題: 回覆 #1 macross1911 的帖子

Some team use Real L1A1

作者: christopher 時間: 20-5-2008 11:35 標題: 回覆 #2 B20_hk 的帖子

Hong Kong Adventure corps~
HKAC

作者: 衰人 時間: 20-5-2008 14:20

ac.........L1A1(真.......但閹咗

作者: bg12_2 時間: 20-5-2008 14:53

HKAC用前皇家香港軍團SLR步槍
HKACC 用AR-15仿真槍 (可以上膛,唔係BB彈槍)
HKSCC 用玩具SA80同國狗SA80 (BB彈槍)

作者: Dr.Eric 時間: 20-5-2008 20:12

HKAC--------Real L1A1

作者: derek_lok 時間: 20-5-2008 21:27

可以放心,,全部都係無攻擊力既閹槍

作者: hmstalent 時間: 20-5-2008 21:40

岩岩玩sea cadet戈時,個po話sea cadet都有批閹既SA80
英軍走戈時留底bor,不過一直冇見過,亦唔覺有出現過

作者: B20_hk 時間: 20-5-2008 21:56 標題: 回覆 #8 hmstalent 的帖子

閹既SA80???

唔會呱

作者: hmstalent 時間: 20-5-2008 21:59

佢咁講我咁打囉|)

作者: Royal_9413 時間: 21-5-2008 00:17

引用:

原帖由 bg12_2 於 20-5-2008 14:53 發表
HKAC用前皇家香港軍團SLR步槍
HKACC 用AR-15仿真槍 (可以上膛,唔係BB彈槍)
HKSCC 用玩具SA80同國狗SA80 (BB彈槍)

有個HKACC C Sqn的下士話係馬記抽起份波箱放返舊鐵落去ge
我都係佢咁講, 我咁打架咋

作者: bg12_2 時間: 21-5-2008 00:37

引用:

原帖由 Royal_9413 於 21-5-2008 00:17 發表

有個HKACC C Sqn的下士話係馬記抽起份波箱放返舊鐵落去ge
我都係佢咁講, 我咁打架咋

totally wrong.

I have met them before time, they show me the rifle. it can be "cock"

作者: Royal_9413 時間: 21-5-2008 00:38

引用:

原帖由 bg12_2 於 21-5-2008 00:37 發表

totally wrong.

I have met them before time, they show me the rifle. it can be "cock"

嘩~我比人呃了

作者: auxair 時間: 21-5-2008 00:53

引用:

原帖由 Royal_9413 於 21-5-2008 00:17 發表

有個HKACC C Sqn的下士話係馬記抽起份波箱放返舊鐵落去ge
我都係佢咁講, 我咁打架咋

Off couse not - the rifles are full  metal replicas with operating metal bolts and genuine M16A2 front grips - sprayed to authentic  AR15 colour and indiviudally reinforced by the licensed firearms dealer Hollywxxxx. Real (but made safe and blunt) bayonets are issued and of course they cannot be fixed on plastic replcas.

After the introduction of the metal replicas, three years ago there was an offer of L1A1s by a Government dept but it was politely turned downed  by HKACC because

(a)  Deactivited firearms require a designated armoury to stow them;
(b)  Deactivated firearms require a license from the Police each time they are deployed outside base;
(c)  OSH factor: AR15's weight and size deemed more suitable for use by both male and females members; and
(d)  the Management considers the more modern silhouette of AR15 better suits HKACC than SLR.

A wingco should be a more reliable and authoritative source than a corporal.

[ 本帖最後由 auxair 於 21-5-2008 18:24 編輯 ]

作者: bg12_2 時間: 21-5-2008 01:16

引用:

原帖由 hmstalent 於 20-5-2008 21:40 發表
岩岩玩sea cadet戈時,個po話sea cadet都有批閹既SA80
英軍走戈時留底bor,不過一直冇見過,亦唔覺有出現過

haha

forget it~

British Royal Navy leave their SA80 Govt issue Rifle in HKSAR on 1997?????

No way~!

作者: bg12_2 時間: 21-5-2008 01:18

引用:

原帖由 auxair 於 21-5-2008 00:53 發表

Off couse not - the rifles are full metal replicas and with operating metal bolts and genuine M16A2 front grips - sprayed to authentic AR15 colour and then indiviudally reinforced by the l ...

so, it's REAL or NOT????

how much is it???

further more~~ why not using SA80? as air cadet have using it a long time, and I have still see it in some HKACC Squadan unit

作者: auxair 時間: 21-5-2008 01:25

(1) Replica rifles - in other words - not real. Real M16A2 front grips and real M7 Bayonets (but chrome plated and made blunt and safe).

(2) How much - $2000 base unit, $500 service charge for structural reinforcement by the arms dealer, $400 to $500 for the M-7 Bayonet plus chroming and "blunting"

(2) Political correctness - SA80 is only used by the British Armed Forces. AR15 is used by the HK government.

The metal AR15 replica is the only officially authorised HKACC Drill Purpose Rifle (there are even written regulations governing its uses). SA80 replicas are used by very few units as "toy guns" and can no longer be carried at any formal parades.

[ 本帖最後由 auxair 於 21-5-2008 01:29 編輯 ]

作者: bg12_2 時間: 21-5-2008 01:33

very details! thx

SURPRISE that Air Cadets using over $3000 rifle in each Guards cadet!

[ 本帖最後由 bg12_2 於 21-5-2008 01:36 編輯 ]

作者: Royal_9413 時間: 21-5-2008 01:38

引用:

原帖由 auxair 於 21-5-2008 00:53 發表

Off couse not - the rifles are full metal replicas and with operating metal bolts and genuine M16A2 front grips - sprayed to authentic AR15 colour and then indiviudally reinforced by the l ...

我知我比人呃左啦

作者: auxair 時間: 21-5-2008 01:41

I suggested to Lt Cdr CHOW who is in charge of Drill in HKSCC to consider adopting the new metal SA80 air soft guns, as Brigadier Chris Hammerbeck (Commander of 4 Armd Bde at the first Gulf War in 1991), CE of the British Chamber of Commerce in Hong Kong mentioned last year at one social occasion that after seeing HKACC Honour Guards, the BCC was willling to donate some surplus SA80 bayonets to HKSCC. To what extent the HKSCC embrace (or otherwise) the idea I don't know.

作者: bg12_2 時間: 21-5-2008 01:46

引用:

原帖由 auxair 於 21-5-2008 01:41 發表
I suggested to Lt Cdr CHOW who is in charge of Drill in HKSCC to consider adopting the new metal SA80 air soft guns, as Brigadier Chris Hammerbeck (Commander of 4 Armd Bde at the first Gulf War i ...

but how can real bayonet put on the SA80 air soft guns?????

作者: auxair 時間: 21-5-2008 01:53

may be the new metal ones can allow bayonet fixing ... I don't know, up to HKSCC to find out themselves..I only passed on the tips that no less than Brig Hammerbeck of the Desert Jerboa was willing to influence the local British Chamber of Commerce to support.

[ 本帖最後由 auxair 於 21-5-2008 01:57 編輯 ]

作者: Shan10 時間: 21-5-2008 02:09

HKAC lo , 最正啦, 有性趣咪入黎受下訓lor !!
埋黎埋黎!!

作者: bg12_2 時間: 21-5-2008 02:37

引用:

原帖由 Shan10 於 21-5-2008 02:09 發表
HKAC lo , 最正啦, 有性趣咪入黎受下訓lor !!
埋黎埋黎!!

but the DRILL of HKAC is much retrogress that J Corps....... bad drill with good rifle~

my friend is a HKAC Sgt Maj, that what he told

作者: auxair 時間: 21-5-2008 09:40

引用:

原帖由 bg12_2 於 21-5-2008 01:33 發表
very details! thx

SURPRISE that Air Cadets using over $3000 rifle in each Guards cadet!

Resources put to frontline.  You may also be surpirsed that each 20 min helicopter flight for cadet costs on average $425 per head ($300 for R44 and $550 per head for EC120), and there are up to 1200 flights each year, subject to weather and aircraft serviceability

Each glider schcholarship costs at least $13,000, there  are 5 each year, plus one  full $30000 scholarship

Each of the 6 x 10-hr flyiing scholarships  costs $20,000 apiece. The four one month scholarships to Adelaide cost more than $100,000 each (inlcuding flight training costs, room and board, return air fare).

The annual RAF Training Team visit costs $50,000 to $100,000 each year, depending on content.

The 14 HKACC Ceremonial Swords were specially ordered from Wilkinson based on the RAF design but with custom engravings such as HKSAR Bauhinia, and HKACC Roundel in lieu of the Crown above the Air Force eagle. They come in three lengths of blade for use by officers of different statures (32 in [standard], 30 in, 28 in [especially for ladies]). Each costs $17,000 including ceremonial belt. The next batch of swords are likely to be ordered from Germany where a company has bought the toolings and rights of Wilkinson's

Don't get me wrong, just wish to illustrate that it is not a simple operation to run a Cadet Corps and to provide good leadership and aviation educaiton for our young people.

[ 本帖最後由 auxair 於 21-5-2008 14:33 編輯 ]

作者: Royal_9413 時間: 21-5-2008 12:42

引用:

原帖由 Shan10 於 21-5-2008 02:09 發表
HKAC lo , 最正啦, 有性趣咪入黎受下訓lor !!
埋黎埋黎!!

不過我覺得最唔似英軍係HKAC, d官就著到成個英軍咁好靚, 不過d仔就.......

作者: 小子1008 時間: 21-5-2008 14:24

引用:

原帖由 Royal_9413 於 21-5-2008 12:42 發表

不過我覺得最唔似英軍係HKAC, d官就著到成個英軍咁好靚, 不過d仔就.......

d仔點?????

作者: bg12_2 時間: 21-5-2008 14:59

引用:

原帖由 auxair 於 21-5-2008 09:40 發表

Resources put to frontline. You may also be surpirsed that each 20 min helicopter flight for cadet costs on average $425 per head ($300 for R44 and $550 per head for EC120), and there are up ...

RAF Training Team?? Mountain Rescue like CAS??

作者: bg12_2 時間: 21-5-2008 15:08

引用:

原帖由 小子1008 於 21-5-2008 14:24 發表

d仔點?????

like this~~~

[ 本帖最後由 bg12_2 於 25-8-2008 16:38 編輯 ]

作者: auxair 時間: 21-5-2008 15:16

引用:

原帖由 bg12_2 於 21-5-2008 14:59 發表

RAF Training Team?? Mountain Rescue like CAS??

Check this out please
http://302.no-ip.org/cgi-bin/302 ... pic=946&show=30

作者: bg12_2 時間: 21-5-2008 15:24

引用:

原帖由 auxair 於 21-5-2008 15:16 發表

Check this out please
http://302.no-ip.org/cgi-bin/302 ... pic=946&show=30

wow! 強呀! make me wishing to apply HKACC now!!! anyone can join this course?? welcome outsider??? hahaha

英軍操M16!! 難得一見!!

相中果隊Cadet比人好Pro既感覺~! the only thing need to improve is they re not wearing "大頭操兵Boot"

作者: auxair 時間: 21-5-2008 15:29

Thanks, unfortunately the latest intake of direct entry officer cadets and recruit instructors (i.e. airmen) will commence their selection interview this Sunday. This year's disciplined forces volunteers intake (for serving and retired members of the HK disciplined and auxiliary forces) has already started training two weeks ago... you are most welcome next year.

This July, the CAS will be invited to send observers to the UKTT 08 programme

[ 本帖最後由 auxair 於 21-5-2008 23:46 編輯 ]

作者: 小子1008 時間: 21-5-2008 17:23

引用:

原帖由 bg12_2 於 21-5-2008 15:08 發表

like this~~~

e隊校隊梗係差啦..唔係所有ac既人都好似佢地咁

作者: bg12_2 時間: 21-5-2008 17:58

引用:

原帖由 auxair 於 21-5-2008 15:29 發表
Thanks, unfortunately the latest intake of direct entry officer cadets and recruit instructors (i.e. airmen) will commence their selection interview this Sunday. This year's disciplined forces vo ...

i see~ i'm in disciplined force, may be apply later~ THX

作者: bg12_2 時間: 21-5-2008 18:03

引用:

原帖由 小子1008 於 21-5-2008 17:23 發表

e隊校隊梗係差啦..唔係所有ac既人都好似佢地咁

唔係喎~ 前排AC Annual Parade 九成都係咁款, 有好多Cadet~甚至好多Officer, 連帽都未識帶好

有個無聲操........................無胃提..........差到呢......

我有影相同片~但無胃放上黎, 此終唔係咁好

作者: gd1893 時間: 21-5-2008 21:51

DSVS係值得參加既，既幫到人，又幫到自己，
而且對各部門工友黎講，個時間負擔唔係太重。
(街外朋友要3~9個月訓練...工友們....9日)

係套制服肉赤左小小...但又唔想入套堅既RAF黎熱死自己...

BTW，在下正是本屆受訓中既DSVS成員。
各位幸會幸會。

引用:

原帖由 bg12_2 於 21-5-2008 17:58 發表

i see~ i'm in disciplined force, may be apply later~ THX

作者: bg12_2 時間: 21-5-2008 22:34

引用:

原帖由 gd1893 於 21-5-2008 21:51 發表
DSVS係值得參加既，既幫到人，又幫到自己，
而且對各部門工友黎講，個時間負擔唔係太重。
(街外朋友要3~9個月訓練...工友們....9日)

係套制服肉赤左小小...但又唔想入套堅既RAF黎熱死自己...

BTW，在下 ...

o~ thx for sharing!

作者: auxair 時間: 21-5-2008 23:52

引用:

原帖由 gd1893 於 21-5-2008 21:51 發表
DSVS係值得參加既，既幫到人，又幫到自己，
而且對各部門工友黎講，個時間負擔唔係太重。
(街外朋友要3~9個月訓練...工友們....9日)

係套制服肉赤左小小...但又唔想入套堅既RAF黎熱死自己...

BTW，在下 ...

Thanks.

My personal opinion is that the classroom discipline is a bit strict, which is not really necessary for disciplined forces colleagues, unless they are on the parade ground experiencing the difference of "Air Force" style and HK Disciplne Force style drill through practice. I think the Directing Staff can make it a bit more easy going.

Please let the Directing Staff know how to better improve the next course by way of course evaluation.

[ 本帖最後由 auxair 於 22-5-2008 00:25 編輯 ]

作者: 甘草 時間: 22-5-2008 19:55 標題: 回覆 #35 bg12_2 的帖子

個日我都有去
你唔可以話甘差的,
1佢地係係制服團x,唔係army,
2.佢地係1,2星期先操到1次,有甘水準,係好好
3.我唔知你有冇學過drill,你下場操,我相信你一定冇野講,
(仲有drill 唔係一個人,係一班人的)

作者: derek_lok 時間: 22-5-2008 21:08 標題: 回覆 #39 甘草的帖子

或者咁講,,香港11軍,,邊有隊真係操得好??

你睇完哩段片我諗你會放過d小朋友
http://jp.youtube.com/watch?v=Uez27xEeSQU&feature=related

別多多要求

[ 本帖最後由 derek_lok 於 22-5-2008 21:12 編輯 ]

作者: bg12_2 時間: 22-5-2008 21:27

引用:

原帖由甘草於 22-5-2008 19:55 發表
個日我都有去
你唔可以話甘差的,
1佢地係係制服團x,唔係army,
2.佢地係1,2星期先操到1次,有甘水準,係好好
3.我唔知你有冇學過drill,你下場操,我相信你一定冇野講,
(仲有drill 唔係一個人,係一班人的)

甘草, I'm a "Force" member, I knew what is Drill, and I know well what is GOOD & what is BAD

my brother was in the J Corps before, the standard is much much much higher

for my personal view, UGs can made much better than I saw on that day

u may find Scout Parade better than that parade.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EzQ95YRfz8

[ 本帖最後由 bg12_2 於 22-5-2008 21:29 編輯 ]

作者: artillery 時間: 22-5-2008 22:26 標題: 回覆 #29 bg12_2 的帖子

what the hel....

作者: bg12_2 時間: 22-5-2008 22:30

引用:

原帖由 artillery 於 22-5-2008 22:26 發表
what the hel....

實話實說姐

如有不璊,最多唔講

作者: derek_lok 時間: 22-5-2008 23:19 標題: 回覆 #43 bg12_2 的帖子

都睇左咁多年..........算罷啦..........

作者: auxair 時間: 22-5-2008 23:21

引用:

原帖由 derek_lok 於 22-5-2008 21:08 發表
或者咁講,,香港11軍,,邊有隊真係操得好??

你睇完哩段片我諗你會放過d小朋友
http://jp.youtube.com/watch?v=Uez27xEeSQU&feature=related

別多多要求

作者: 甘草 時間: 22-5-2008 23:23 標題: 回覆 #41 bg12_2 的帖子

sir 對唔住,可能串到你,但係我係個個制服團x其中一個cadet
都唔上d人係到甘串!

作者: hmstalent 時間: 22-5-2008 23:32

個人認為,三隊cadet中,HKACC真系算系咁架啦,最好佢地,我覺得

作者: artillery 時間: 22-5-2008 23:40 標題: 回覆 #47 hmstalent 的帖子

我都係咁話

作者: gd1893 時間: 22-5-2008 23:46

Auxair Sir, 你講呢點正係我地DSVS同學，
特別係敝部門工友心中所想(其實都講埋出口架喇...)，
而在下亦曾經用其他渠道表達過呢個意見，
當時就得知係負責人員有心安排既，在下亦無話可說。

但亦都因為咁，係某些負責訓練既朋友出現時，個氣氛就變得好尷尬，甚至係惡劣左，
(剛才已經發生左喇...)
咁樣其實係失卻左成個計畫既意義既。

作為工友，我地唔反對係適當場合擺官款，玩認真，大家都明白係咩一回事。
更加同意係對Cadet同街外人既時候應該黎呢套。

但係DSVS入面，有無必要咁樣?
更加無必要去到說話有骨既地步既。

DSVS參加者之中，有rank & files，亦有唔少Officers，
要擺官威、玩認真既功架大家可能都不相伯仲，
咁又何苦係大家都係有心幫人既時後仲黎呢套呢? rite?

個人認為，成個課程既氣氛可以好好多既。

在下多言喇，純粹個人感想。

x x x

by the way, 如果無估錯的話，
Auxair sir應該係剛才係咪黎「賣膏藥」果位長官?

引用:

原帖由 auxair 於 21-5-2008 23:52 發表

Thanks.

My personal opinion is that the classroom discipline is a bit strict, which is not really necessary for disciplined forces colleagues, unless they are on the parade ground experien ...

作者: gd1893 時間: 22-5-2008 23:51

多口搭句訕，
年輕人，
如果你係因為有人挑剔你既努力而感到不滿 / 不忿既，我絕對可以理解。

不過，如果我係你的話，
我會先睇睇自己既表現係咪有咩不足之處，
查找不足然後先會反駁，
而且唔會用咁既語氣囉。

係叻既，自然會有人欣賞，
用不著為人地既「惡意」批評而動氣；

係渣既，比人插比人串係應份，
你亦無資格去為人地既批評而憤怒。

共勉之。

引用:

原帖由甘草於 22-5-2008 23:23 發表
sir 對唔住,可能串到你,但係我係個個制服團x其中一個cadet
都唔上d人係到甘串!

作者: Royal_9413 時間: 22-5-2008 23:51

引用:

原帖由 derek_lok 於 22-5-2008 21:08 發表
或者咁講,,香港11軍,,邊有隊真係操得好??

你睇完哩段片我諗你會放過d小朋友
http://jp.youtube.com/watch?v=Uez27xEeSQU&feature=related

別多多要求

第一個口令員好似唔多夠威嚴咁ge

作者: artillery 時間: 23-5-2008 00:25

咁無聊咁都鬥咀一餐

作者: auxair 時間: 23-5-2008 00:32

引用:

原帖由 gd1893 於 22-5-2008 23:46 發表
Auxair Sir, 你講呢點正係我地DSVS同學，
特別係敝部門工友心中所想(其實都講埋出口架喇...)，
而在下亦曾經用其他渠道表達過呢個意見，
當時就得知係負責人員有心安排既，在下亦無話可說。

但亦都因為咁 ...

Thanks for your input - please check pm

[ 本帖最後由 auxair 於 23-5-2008 01:01 編輯 ]

作者: qm00 時間: 23-5-2008 08:45

Totally agree.
This is not what I expected to have.

引用:

原帖由 gd1893 於 22-5-2008 23:46 發表
Auxair Sir, 你講呢點正係我地DSVS同學，
特別係敝部門工友心中所想(其實都講埋出口架喇...)，
而在下亦曾經用其他渠道表達過呢個意見，
當時就得知係負責人員有心安排既，在下亦無話可說。

但亦都因為咁 ...

作者: derek_lok 時間: 23-5-2008 12:25

引用:

原帖由 artillery 於 23-5-2008 00:25 發表
咁無聊咁都鬥咀一餐

只可以講
尊嚴,,傲氣,,榮譽
絕對唔係來自擺官威&打官腔既人

香港11軍,,好聽D既青少年制服團體,,難聽講句,,同學校,,社區中心既興趣小組無分別!!如果有師兄係教學校隊,,社區中心就會明,,外人唔會理你既團體有幾咁光榮既歷史,,外人亦賴理你團體有什麼引以為傲既訓練,,只會覺得你係咁多個興趣小組既其中一組,,咁講的話,,除左由HQ直接管轄,,直接訓練既直屬部隊外,,請問有咩質素可言??亦問有咩事情可炫耀??還要用自己團隊既兄弟姐妹和其他制服團隊比較??未免太刻薄了!!!!

任達華都講啦..著起套U就係自己人啦!!!睇開D啦~~~各位

作者: hmstalent 時間: 23-5-2008 18:14 標題: 回覆 #55 derek_lok 的帖子

好認同,我sea cadet做jc已經要教校隊,絕對明白d人咩心態

作者: MS 時間: 24-5-2008 17:18 標題: 回覆 #29 bg12_2 的帖子

此圖之commander 犯了一個大錯.............是什麽呢!

作者: fangcw_joe 時間: 24-5-2008 19:36

[quote]原帖由 mswong 於 24-5-2008 17:18 發表
此圖之commander 犯了一個大錯.............是什

作者: hmstalent 時間: 24-5-2008 20:41 標題: 回覆 #57 mswong 的帖子

9個人應該排兩排唔系三排!?

作者: derek_lok 時間: 24-5-2008 21:27

引用:

原帖由 mswong 於 24-5-2008 17:18 發表
此圖之commander 犯了一個大錯.............是什麽呢!

係唔係揹手袋呢?

作者: Royal_9413 時間: 25-5-2008 02:42

引用:

原帖由 mswong 於 24-5-2008 17:18 發表
此圖之commander 犯了一個大錯.............是什麽呢!

好似合埋腳, 但手放了在後面?

Attention腳, Stand easy手?

作者: qm00 時間: 25-5-2008 08:24

Feet should be of the shoulder width, I think the problem is on her handbag that her right hand cross over the bag.

作者: hmstalent 時間: 25-5-2008 11:17 標題: 回覆 #61 Royal_9413 的帖子

角度問題咋

作者: artillery 時間: 25-5-2008 23:16

本身呢隊野出操個樣都輸晒la.....要拾佢地錯,乜都有得拾
因為根本睇見張相就算佢地操得岩...我自己都忍唔住想拾佢地錯

作者: hmstalent 時間: 25-5-2008 23:24

我念張張相d人打格仔先好d,話曬我地而家系度對人指指點點

作者: MS 時間: 26-5-2008 00:02 標題: 回覆 #29 bg12_2 的帖子

commander對住隊人無機會 stand at ease?

作者: MS 時間: 26-5-2008 00:07 標題: 回覆 #65 hmstalent 的帖子

對不起 MS 無意開罪,

作者: jwlchan 時間: 26-5-2008 02:19

引用:

原帖由 mswong 於 25-5-2008 16:02 發表
commander對住隊人無機會 stand at ease?

算啦! MS大佬, 小朋友玩操兵冇乜所謂啦, 你唔見97回歸十年parade, command 叫 eyes right 但係又行鎗禮?

我想都係快d跟足中國步操, 唔好再似"四不像"好!

作者: Shan10 時間: 29-5-2008 01:39

各位，大家當傾下咪算ｌｏｒ，我都識唔少ug 的人, 最後我覺得就係,
隊隊都, 除左真係好似derek 兄講, hq 外, 別無救藥

打比例: 童子軍10年來, 不斷downgrade, 都唔知係咩, 我見證著衰退, 慘不忍睹

後少年團? 唔通你叫佢搒戰壕咩?

作者: hmstalent 時間: 29-5-2008 02:01 標題: 回覆 #67 mswong 的帖子

唔好同我講sorry,點受得起

我系拍"我地"咁樣開罪人姐....

作者: auxair 時間: 29-5-2008 02:26

引用:

原帖由 Shan10 於 29-5-2008 01:52 發表
各位，大家當傾下咪算ｌｏｒ，我都識唔少ug 的人, 最後我覺得就係,
隊隊都, 除左真係好似derek 兄講, hq 外, 別無救藥

打比例: 童子軍10年來, 不斷downgrade, 都唔知係咩, 我見證著衰退, 慘不忍睹

後少 ...

係真唔係真? 呢兩隊都唔係HQ隊噃....

(606 [Police Children] Sqn)
http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=eJZ9_7ypAw4&feature=related
http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=ohygcbURK58&watch_response

(602 [HKU SPACE] Sqn)
http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=LA-XlFgMWyk&feature=related

名師出高徒，但名師不一定守總部。
各自各精采，良性競爭倒也是提高水準的好方法

作者: tango10 時間: 29-5-2008 12:15

引用:

原帖由 Shan10 於 29-5-2008 01:52 發表
各位，大家當傾下咪算ｌｏｒ，我都識唔少ug 的人, 最後我覺得就係,
隊隊都, 除左真係好似derek 兄講, hq 外, 別無救藥

打比例: 童子軍10年來, 不斷downgrade, 都唔知係咩, 我見證著衰退, 慘不忍睹

後少 ...

領教過班家長的緊張法就知點解會不斷下降!

作者: Shan10 時間: 29-5-2008 13:57

中!!!!!:x

引用:

原帖由 tango10 於 29-5-2008 12:29 發表

領教過班家長的緊張法就知點解會不斷下降!

作者: Shan10 時間: 29-5-2008 13:58

但我有辦法解決.............!!.

作者: derek_lok 時間: 29-5-2008 16:04

引用:

原帖由 auxair 於 29-5-2008 02:39 發表

係真唔係真? 呢兩隊都唔係HQ隊噃....

(606 Sqn)
http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=eJZ9_7ypAw4&feature=related
http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=ohygcbURK58&watch_response

(602 Sq ...

咁我可以同你講,,Scout既警察子弟旅一樣咁堅~

但在下想請教一個問題,,小朋友既制服團體,,值得一班成年人說三道四嘛??在下一向都唔明點解要對佢地評頭品足??制服團體係訓練小朋友既機構,,點解要搵小朋友來比較呀?有錯有壞,,都係d教官問題罷了.......

有位前輩教過在下: 領袖要企係小朋友前面!! 如今睇返此POST............唉........

中國人有句:養不教,,父之過,,教不嚴,,師之惰.................

作者: auxair 時間: 29-5-2008 17:29

引用:

原帖由 derek_lok 於 29-5-2008 16:17 發表

咁我可以同你講,,Scout既警察子弟旅一樣咁堅~

但在下想請教一個問題,,小朋友既制服團體,,值得一班成年人說三道四嘛??在下一向都唔明點解要對佢地評頭品足??制服團體係訓練小朋友既機構,,點解要搵小朋友來 ...

Good job then, Scout Association. I never doubt the standard of our scout brothers and sisters. Even though they are not practising armed drill (we'll never know), members of the Scout Association drill team are now wearing pips and chervons on their uniform like the army (or the police), on the epaulettes and above the shoulder title "HKSA" - quite a transformation indeed from original philosophy of Lord Baden-Powell. The Scout Mess Dresses are already quite impressively "police looking", with the police style service cap, complete with silver/golden braids or oak leaves on the peak.

I am merely highlighting the fact that even non-HQ units can be good, given efforts, determination and good instructors, in response to the statement "除左由HQ直接管轄,,直接訓練既直屬部隊外,,請問有咩質素可言??"

Friendly competition is a way of life and in most circumstances unavoidable. It was through competition held at the Police College on 26 April between the Scouts, Girl Guides, BB, Red Cross, St John Ambulance Cadets, CAS Cadets, Road Safety, HKACC, HKSCC and HKAC (GB did no take part) that representatives from two uniformed groups were chosen to be the Golden Bauhinia Square Flag Raisers on 4 May morning.

I was actively involved in the preparation work of two of the chosen Flag Raisers. So I think they felt that their leaders were standing by them.

And I never critcized any UGs, just praising them.

[ 本帖最後由 auxair 於 29-5-2008 20:14 編輯 ]

作者: qm00 時間: 30-5-2008 12:26

引用:

原帖由 auxair 於 29-5-2008 17:43 發表

Good job then, Scout Association. I never doubt the standard of our scout brothers and sisters. Even though they are not practising armed drill (we'll never know), members of the Scout Associ ...

作者: auxair 時間: 30-5-2008 13:28 標題: 回覆 #77 qm00 的帖子

"Good Job then, Scout Association" - my response to" 咁我可以同你講,,Scout既警察子弟旅一樣咁堅~"

Yes, there are reports (albeit uncorroborated) that the Hong Kong Scout Association Drill Team is practising armed drills. What have been positively confirmed and witnessed are the wearing of disiciplined/armed forces style pips and chervons on the uniform of Drill Team Members.

Just sharing some interesting observations and new developments. The right of HKSA Management on how best to run the organization is fully respected.

[ 本帖最後由 auxair 於 30-5-2008 14:04 編輯 ]

作者: auxair 時間: 5-6-2008 02:03

We've all heard (some of us seen) the myth. The second to none silent drill of RHKR(V) J Corps

Now thanks to modern technology in the form of YouTube, we can travel back in time to relive the good old days

http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=Ty7rk97_aho&feature=related
http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=J7BIcSPI3Pc&feature=related

My view - when compared to the modern HKAC, HKSCC and HKACC, I am not really impressed (except perhaps their blank firing SLRs), and they were all boys, no girls (I give extra credits to girls drilling with swords and rifles)

- but that is just my personal opinion

http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=IvvXEQWH6B8&feature=related (HKAC)
http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=fzAhAg0Ub6s&feature=related (HKSCC)
http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=_nKbTXB1hg8&feature=related (HKACC Team 1 - RAF style C Sqn)
http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=eJZ9_7ypAw4&feature=related (HKACC Team 2 - HKPF style 606 Sqn)

How about you?

[ 本帖最後由 auxair 於 5-6-2008 02:28 編輯 ]

歡迎光臨 CGF (http://wargamehk.com/cgf/)