Board logo

標題: 港警濫權剝光豬 聯國關切 要求港府懲處警方於脫衣搜身和反賣淫行動時的不當行為 [打印本頁]

作者: jwlchan    時間: 26-11-2008 01:30     標題: 港警濫權剝光豬 聯國關切 要求港府懲處警方於脫衣搜身和反賣淫行動時的不當行為

詳情請參看下列綱頁:

http://www.worldjournal.com/wj-hk-news.php?nt_seq_id=1808488
作者: 莊家-犯罪無間    時間: 26-11-2008 01:36

我都好關注世界其他地區的警察濫權問題,聯合國o個班講人權的茂李幾時可以出一份世界警察濫權報告??
作者: MS    時間: 26-11-2008 01:37     標題: 回復 1# 的帖子

嘩!你算八喎............香港差人做野都關你事 都好熱心公益啫.........jwlchan唔通你想乜英回流 係就唔好預我你床下低果幾箱紅酒..........洗唔洗ms幫你飲咗佢

[ 本帖最後由 MS 於 26-11-2008 02:23 編輯 ]
作者: MS    時間: 26-11-2008 01:43     標題: 回復 2# 的帖子

你..........好似話............個個都唔行班馬綫喇 點解淨係拉我
作者: yeungm    時間: 26-11-2008 01:48     標題: 回復 2# 的帖子

would american police be worse? thanks
作者: jwlchan    時間: 26-11-2008 01:50

引用:
原帖由 MS 於 25-11-2008 17:37 發表
嘩!你算八............香港差人做野都關你事 都好熱心公益.........jwlchan唔通你想乜英回流 係就唔好預我床下低果箱紅酒..........洗唔洗ms幫你飲咗佢
唉, 又衰多事, 唱衰香港?
係, 前年我有想過回流, 但係自從睇到d新聞, 講出來就一定俾人鬧, 講我偏見, 只識攻擊偉大, 英武文明既香港..........所以好驚返去俾人詳细搜後枢.....而家改變主意, 都係異地终老算數!
我边箱红酒先? 一個月起馬飲1-2箱, 點記得咁多?
作者: 莊家-犯罪無間    時間: 26-11-2008 01:51

引用:
原帖由 MS 於 26-11-2008 01:43 發表
你..........好似話............個個都唔行班馬綫喇 點解淨係拉我
唔係ar,我係想聯合國出一入總匯睇下包括埋香港警察的濫權情況同點濫權法見識一下je
作者: 莊家-犯罪無間    時間: 26-11-2008 02:00

引用:
原帖由 yeungm 於 26-11-2008 01:48 發表
would american police be worse? thanks
度度的人都係差唔多,人來來去去都係咁,有好的亦有唔好,

呢度有的野,其他地方都一樣有,人可以做的野其實好狹窄
作者: jwlchan    時間: 26-11-2008 02:05

講真, 全世界都有警察的濫權情況, 問題係冇話老馮係人都通後枢, 放蛇老馮做完全套先至拉......到底世界有幾多警察會咁, 我都好想知到.
作者: gtoray    時間: 26-11-2008 02:08

要求港府懲處 ...?
唔知個 repost 係咪真有呢句.....
作者: jwlchan    時間: 26-11-2008 02:13

引用:
原帖由 gtoray 於 25-11-2008 18:08 發表
要求港府懲處 ...?
唔知個 repost 係咪真有呢句.....
.............又要求港府懲處警方於反賣淫行動時不當行為....................港府必須對警方進行與賣淫有關行動時所作的不當行為,即所謂放蛇手淫「食免費餐」,進行徹底調查,如指控屬實必須檢控及懲處,糾正執法人員以為濫權可獲寬恕的錯誤訊息。

[ 本帖最後由 jwlchan 於 25-11-2008 18:15 編輯 ]
作者: 莊家-犯罪無間    時間: 26-11-2008 02:15

引用:
原帖由 jwlchan 於 26-11-2008 02:05 發表
講真, 全世界都有警察的濫權情況, 問題係冇話老馮係人都通後枢, 放蛇老馮做完全套先至拉......到底世界有幾多警察會咁, 我都好想知到.
所以可以考慮叫佢地做一份比大家睇下唔同地方的警察(包括香港警察)點做,出左肯定大開眼界
作者: HunterX    時間: 26-11-2008 02:16

引用:
原帖由 jwlchan 於 26-11-2008 02:05 發表
講真, 全世界都有警察的濫權情況, 問題係冇話老馮係人都通後枢, 放蛇老馮做完全套先至拉......到底世界有幾多警察會咁, 我都好想知到.
其實香港都唔係個個人入到警署都要通既... 放蛇都唔係個個都會抽水既......
作者: jwlchan    時間: 26-11-2008 02:17

引用:
原帖由 莊家-犯罪無間 於 25-11-2008 18:15 發表

所以可以考慮叫佢地做一份比大家睇下唔同地方的警察(包括香港警察)點做,出左肯定大開眼界
係呀, 比起緬甸香港係幾好既! 重有好多地方添....咁所以香港就可以老馮做?
作者: jwlchan    時間: 26-11-2008 02:19

引用:
原帖由 HunterX 於 25-11-2008 18:16 發表


其實香港都唔係個個人入到警署都要通既... 放蛇都唔係個個都會抽水既......
咁就要睇吓港府點講先......
作者: HunterX    時間: 26-11-2008 02:20

引用:
原帖由 jwlchan 於 26-11-2008 02:19 發表


咁就要睇吓港府點講先......
特衰政府講你都信?
作者: 里安    時間: 26-11-2008 02:25

引用:
原帖由 jwlchan 於 26-11-2008 02:17 發表


係呀, 比起緬甸香港係幾好既! 重有好多地方添....咁所以香港就可以老馮做?
上親cgf都只係見到香港警察濫權, 我仲以為得香港會咁做
作者: 莊家-犯罪無間    時間: 26-11-2008 02:28

引用:
原帖由 jwlchan 於 26-11-2008 02:17 發表


係呀, 比起緬甸香港係幾好既! 重有好多地方添....咁所以香港就可以老馮做?
佢地個心態係咪老馮就唔知,當然o係個理據上,佢性交易要有2樣野,一是要有性服務,二是有涉及錢,唔通企o係門口/街問價比錢但又無進行性服務就係性交易??或者有性服務但無收錢又係有交易的成份??

心態的野好難講,呢d野,說不清,亦都要睇執行o個個,一樣米養百樣人,緊係有好有唔好

不過香港的聽到悶,講下緬甸o個d 係點,因為都未有媒體報過
作者: 莊家-犯罪無間    時間: 26-11-2008 02:30

引用:
原帖由 HunterX 於 26-11-2008 02:20 發表


特衰政府講你都信?
邊度的官腔都........
作者: 里安    時間: 26-11-2008 02:33

引用:
原帖由 jwlchan 於 26-11-2008 02:13 發表


.............又要求港府懲處警方於反賣淫行動時不當行為....................港府必須對警方進行與賣淫有關行動時所作的不當行為,即所謂放蛇手淫「食免費餐」,進行徹底調查,如指控屬實必須檢控及懲處,糾正執 ...
其實唔係個個都係咁(唔係我講, 係D"姐姐仔"同我講)

[ 本帖最後由 里安 於 26-11-2008 09:31 編輯 ]
作者: 莊家-犯罪無間    時間: 26-11-2008 02:37

引用:
原帖由 里安 於 26-11-2008 02:33 發表

其實唔係個個都係咁(唔係我講, 係D"姐姐"同我講)
紫咩社的社工??
作者: gtoray    時間: 26-11-2008 03:01

[quote]原帖由 jwlchan 於 26-11-2008 02:05 發表
講真, 全世界都有警察的濫權情況, 問題係冇話老馮係人都通後
作者: 莊家-犯罪無間    時間: 26-11-2008 03:04

引用:
原帖由 gtoray 於 26-11-2008 03:01 發表




我覺得警方下次可以比埋錢先拉人, 豪比佢
d錢判左案事後都算係屬於性工作者??
作者: gtoray    時間: 26-11-2008 03:12

引用:
原帖由 莊家-犯罪無間 於 26-11-2008 03:04 發表

d錢判左案事後都算係屬於性工作者??
呈堂證物o卦
或者可以考慮入
作者: jwlchan    時間: 26-11-2008 04:32

......................................按慣例,委員會要求港府於一年內提交改進資料作出回應。

我地又唔驶咁快咁大聲既, 新聞ge......睇吓點回應啦!
作者: 里安    時間: 26-11-2008 09:30

引用:
原帖由 莊家-犯罪無間 於 26-11-2008 02:37 發表

紫咩社的社工??
紫機構反而係插警察插得最勁果班
作者: Boniface    時間: 26-11-2008 12:17

你話香港警察差,你見識過北美洲既警察之後你會有唔同睇法
作者: 里安    時間: 26-11-2008 15:14

引用:
原帖由 jwlchan 於 26-11-2008 04:32 發表
......................................按慣例,委員會要求港府於一年內提交改進資料作出回應。

我地又唔驶咁快咁大聲既, 新聞ge......睇吓點回應啦!
邊個咁大聲
作者: jwlchan    時間: 26-11-2008 19:07

引用:
原帖由 Boniface 於 26-11-2008 04:17 發表
你話香港警察差,你見識過北美洲既警察之後你會有唔同睇法
咁又係呀, 我在87年代係美國開快車被差人check, 佢拔槍指我.....

唔係話香港警察差,而係覺得此新聞特別, 整到去联合國, 故拿出來吹水ge.....
估唔到被人話太大聲嘈, 真唔好意思

[ 本帖最後由 jwlchan 於 26-11-2008 11:11 編輯 ]
作者: 莊家-犯罪無間    時間: 26-11-2008 19:13

引用:
原帖由 jwlchan 於 26-11-2008 19:07 發表


咁又係呀, 我在87年代係美國開快車被差人check, 佢拔槍指我.....

唔係話香港警察差,而係覺得此新聞特別, 整到去联合國, 故拿出來吹水ge.....
估唔到被人話太大聲嘈, 真唔好意思
香港發生的野,少少都比人擺上國際ga la
作者: MS    時間: 26-11-2008 20:05     標題: 回復 17# 的帖子

任何人如有料到,都可以發表下 ................吹水精神
作者: jwlchan    時間: 26-11-2008 20:39

引用:
原帖由 莊家-犯罪無間 於 26-11-2008 11:13 發表

香港發生的野,少少都比人擺上國際ga la
香港真係惦,慘, 咁少意思既嘢, 剝光豬及食老免都比人擺上國際, 應該由佢就算啦!
作者: gtoray    時間: 26-11-2008 23:30

[quote]原帖由 jwlchan 於 26-11-2008 20:39 發表


香港真係惦,慘, 咁少意思既
作者: gtoray    時間: 26-11-2008 23:44

找到了
http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cat/docs/CAT.C.HKG.CO.4.pdf

自己參詳
作者: 莊家-犯罪無間    時間: 27-11-2008 00:42

引用:
原帖由 jwlchan 於 26-11-2008 20:39 發表


香港真係惦,慘, 咁少意思既嘢, 剝光豬及食老免都比人擺上國際, 應該由佢就算啦!
咪係又無比人拍到片又無影相,人道d學下美軍咁玩d戰俘,影曬相比人可以追究先得ga ma

睇下套STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE學下人地d標準程序ar ma
作者: jwlchan    時間: 27-11-2008 01:58

引用:
原帖由 gtoray 於 26-11-2008 15:44 發表
找到了
http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cat/docs/CAT.C.HKG.CO.4.pdf

自己參詳
我睇過下, 好似同世界曰報講既差不多:

Strip search and body cavity search
10. The Committee notes the new Police guidelines in force from 1 July 2008 on the handling of searches of detainees in police custody. While welcoming that, under this revised procedure, a designated officer has to justify the scope and conduct of a search based on objective and identifiable criteria, the Committee is concerned at:
a) the Police Commissioner’s determination that every person in police custody has to be searched every time he or she enters a detention facility maintained by the police, making body searches automatic for all individuals in police custody, irrespective of whether or not there is any objective justification thereto;
b) allegations of abusive strip searches, including in facilities of the Immigration Department and of the Correctional Services Department; and
c) allegations of the routine practice of conducting body cavity searches of those entering in prison, despite the fact that Rule 9 of the Hong Kong prison rules only provides for the possibility of conducting such searches.
The HKSAR should:
a) ensure that strip searches for persons in police custody are limited to cases where there is a reasonable and clear justification; if carried out, the search has to be conducted with the least intrusive means and in full conformity with article 16 of the Convention; an independent mechanism to monitor those searches, upon request of the detainee, should also be provided;
b) establish precise and strict guidelines regulating the strip searches conducted by all law-enforcement officials, including those from the Immigration and Correctional Services Department; if these guidelines are already in place, they should be strictly abided by and their observance consistently monitored; records of searches should be made and all abuses 4
committed should be thoroughly investigated and, if substantiated, punished; and
c) seek alternate methods to body cavity search for routine screening of prisoners; if such search has to be conducted, it must be only as a last resort and should be performed by trained health personnel and with due regard for the individual’s privacy and dignity.
Police operations
11. The Committee welcomes the information provided by the delegation that the Police has reviewed and revised, in late 2007, the guidelines for the conduct of officers engaging in police operations in the context of prostitution-related offences. However, the Committee is concerned at the allegations of routine police abuses of persons during such operations.
HKSAR authorities should thoroughly investigate all allegations of abuses committed during police operations in the context of prostitution-related offences which, if substantiated, should be appropriately prosecuted and punished. The HKSAR should also tackle, including through training and awareness-raising activities, all existing attitudes suggesting that such abuses may be condoned.
Independent investigation of police misconduct
12. The Committee welcomes the enactment of the Independent Police Complaints Council (IPCC) Ordinance on 12 July 2008 converting the IPCC into a statutory body, as previously recommended by this Committee. However, the Committee is concerned that, while the statutory framework has reinforced the independent role of the IPCC, the latter only has advisory and oversight functions to monitor and review the activity of the Complaints Against Police Office (CAPO), which is still - in fact - the body responsible for handling and investigating complaints of police misconduct. In this respect, the Committee also notes with concern the information that - despite the considerable number of reportable complaints filed with the CAPO – a small percentage of them were considered as substantiated and only in one case an officer has been prosecuted and convicted of a criminal offence.
The HKSAR should continue to take steps to establish a fully independent mechanism mandated to receive and investigate complaints on police misconduct. This body should be equipped with the necessary human and financial resources and have the executive authority to formulate binding recommendations in respect of investigations conducted and findings regarding such complaints, in line with the requirements of Article 12 of the convention.
作者: jwlchan    時間: 27-11-2008 02:00

引用:
原帖由 莊家-犯罪無間 於 26-11-2008 16:42 發表

咪係又無比人拍到片又無影相,人道d學下美軍咁玩d戰俘,影曬相比人可以追究先得ga ma

睇下套STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE學下人地d標準程序ar ma
乜都除清, 點有機會影呀?
作者: 莊家-犯罪無間    時間: 27-11-2008 02:05

引用:
原帖由 jwlchan 於 27-11-2008 02:00 發表


乜都除清, 點有機會影呀?
d警察自己影ar ma,美軍捉左d 俘虜緊係美軍拍番la,按一般認知,有幾可會見到捉左d戰俘會比佢咁自由走動,重要比佢地揸機拍ga je

你睇番d舊聞,d美軍邊拍邊笑tim
作者: gtoray    時間: 27-11-2008 02:10

引用:
原帖由 jwlchan 於 27-11-2008 01:58 發表


我睇過下, 好似同世界曰報講既差不多:

Strip search and body cavity search
10. The Committee notes the new Police guidelines in force from 1 July 2008 on the handling of searches of detainees in  ...
係, 只不過有d斷章取義
作者: jwlchan    時間: 27-11-2008 02:28

引用:
原帖由 gtoray 於 26-11-2008 18:10 發表


係, 只不過有d斷章取義
我又唔睇到有乜斷章取義......可能我既中英文水準都未夠高水準, 雖然我以前曾经做過政府傳譯, 而家老咗就差d....

同時, 咁就要睇下港府點回應UN .........
作者: jwlchan    時間: 27-11-2008 02:41

引用:
原帖由 莊家-犯罪無間 於 26-11-2008 18:05 發表

d警察自己影ar ma,美軍捉左d 俘虜緊係美軍拍番la,按一般認知,有幾可會見到捉左d戰俘會比佢咁自由走動,重要比佢地揸機拍ga je

你睇番d舊聞,d美軍邊拍邊笑tim
咁就睇有冇人會做叻!

假設及未發生既情況講出來吹水幾有味!
作者: jwlchan    時間: 27-11-2008 03:28     標題: 聯國關切剝光豬 警搜身不鬆手 回應已添金屬探測器 未承諾減少不人道待遇

詳情請參看:

http://www.worldjournal.com/wj-h ... 010&sc_seq_id=5
作者: gtoray    時間: 27-11-2008 05:01

引用:
原帖由 jwlchan 於 27-11-2008 03:28 發表
詳情請參看:

http://www.worldjournal.com/wj-h ... 010&sc_seq_id=5
Good, 唔會比人嘈兩嘈就軟曬腳




歡迎光臨 CGF (http://wargamehk.com/cgf/) Powered by Discuz! 6.0.0