CGF - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: Oakley unsurpassed impact protection [打印本頁]

作者: EF+LOK 時間: 28-3-2010 18:28 標題: Oakley unsurpassed impact protection

i just saw at oakley site,it say all M frame lens is "unsurpassed impact protection" (未超越撞擊保護), so why we will choose this for war game..

B4 i broke 2 lens when i played below 2J games.I try to make exchange at oakley.HK,but they delined.And they sent my lens to USA,then the result is no exchange , cox i bought it over a year,so the lens just protect my eyes one years?

If you ar me , what will you do ,make a complaint or still use oakley in games?I really cant trust oakley anymore.

____________

[ 本帖最後由 EF+LOK 於 28-3-2010 20:47 編輯 ]

圖片附件: 49418a359b73c.jpg (28-3-2010 18:32, 9.07 KB) / 該附件被下載次數 57
http://wargamehk.com/cgf/attachment.php?aid=96565

作者: ayaka 時間: 28-3-2010 19:09

唔出奇啦...我上次用支aeg....打0.3g彈1j力
~4m到打裂左副oakley

作者: vassilihk 時間: 28-3-2010 19:47

其實佢塊lens 過唔過到Z87.2003?

作者: EF+LOK 時間: 28-3-2010 20:46

i think only SI ballistic could pass impact test.

作者: vassilihk 時間: 28-3-2010 20:50

plz check this out

https://secure.usstandardissue.com/Product_Category.cfm?id=14

作者: ++朗++ 時間: 28-3-2010 21:52

因為膠會舊化
所以無論你用咩牌子
佢都會叫你用一段時間就要換

作者: vassilihk 時間: 28-3-2010 21:58

引用:

原帖由 EF+LOK 於 28-3-2010 18:28 發表
i just saw at oakley site,it say all M frame lens is "unsurpassed impact protection" (未超越撞擊保護), so why we will choose this for war game..

B4 i broke 2 lens when i played below 2J games.I ...

你講副m frame 係 si m frame , 2個product 尼

作者: theloggoo 時間: 28-3-2010 22:02

自己要用, 自已負責...

作者: phantomDx 時間: 28-3-2010 22:14

試下用第二個排子la

作者: 資源回收筒=人= 時間: 28-3-2010 22:18

我果副吉打都用左5 6年

用到有一層野係面

我諗都係時候換

歡迎光臨 CGF (http://wargamehk.com/cgf/)