CGF - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 請問有冇用菲林既師兄? (新加對比相) [打印本頁]

作者: cato 時間: 4-8-2010 00:30 標題: 請問有冇用菲林既師兄? (新加對比相)

吾知你地發吾發覺
菲林SCAN係自己電腦睇好細利好滑
但當UPLOAD上FACEBOOK之後D相就勁多NOICE....相差好遠
我問我朋友佢又冇呢個問題...
但我自己對比就好明顯..
咩問題呢!!

以下係FACEBOOK 儲存相既SPHOTOS.AK.FBCDN.NET同PHOTOBUCKET既分別
同一張相size都變左..會吾會壓縮技術問題呢..
FB

一般網上相簿

[ 本帖最後由 cato 於 4-8-2010 01:10 編輯 ]

作者: Elf 時間: 4-8-2010 01:19

facebook does screw up the picture quality, nothing to do with whether the photo was taken by CMOS or films.
use mobileme, photobucket or any other hosting websites to upload your pictures.

作者: cato 時間: 4-8-2010 11:55

引用:

原帖由 Elf 於 4-8-2010 01:19 發表
facebook does screw up the picture quality, nothing to do with whether the photo was taken by CMOS or films.
use mobileme, photobucket or any other hosting websites to upload your pictures.

不個分別都幾大

作者: ATM 時間: 4-8-2010 12:41

yes., photos uploaded to facebook color and quality are all changed

作者: louisli 時間: 4-8-2010 22:04

其實好多online album都會壓縮你張圖片先放上去
失鬼晒真

作者: Elf 時間: 4-8-2010 22:15

i'm subscribing to mobileme service (mac's online storage facility)
perfect quality and seamless integration to aperture 3

作者: mike-mike 時間: 5-8-2010 14:53

通常都係自已先縮細再up上去的~

作者: cato 時間: 5-8-2010 20:29

我朋友建議我800x600
又要做d功夫....

作者: mike-mike 時間: 5-8-2010 21:15

引用:

原帖由 cato 於 5-8-2010 20:29 發表
我朋友建議我800x600
又要做d功夫....

有d tools係可以batch咁樣resize的, 好方便架咋~

歡迎光臨 CGF (http://wargamehk.com/cgf/)