Board logo

標題: Trophy - Active Protection System [打印本頁]
作者: -l-    時間: 26-1-2007 23:22     標題: Trophy - Active Protection System

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsJLHX7gxxg
作者: Iceman    時間: 27-1-2007 02:04

[] Is that real!!!![]
作者: ZaMaR    時間: 27-1-2007 19:29

唔防砲彈....[em62]
作者: gtoray    時間: 27-1-2007 22:35

咩原理呢?[what]
作者: 莊家-犯罪無間    時間: 28-1-2007 00:50

絕對領域[:[]
作者: sunny    時間: 28-1-2007 03:23

I think is just a radar lock on the target and then shoot it down with shape charge, or some type of directional explosive
作者: gtoray    時間: 28-1-2007 04:27

引用:
原帖由 sunny 於 28-1-2007 03:23 發表
I think is just a radar lock on the target and then shoot it down with shape charge, or some type of directional explosive
有冇咁快反應啊?

會唔會係利用引爆方式?
作者: -l-    時間: 28-1-2007 08:38

引用:
原帖由 gtoray 於 28-1-2007 04:27 發表


有冇咁快反應啊?

會唔會係利用引爆方式?
係! 迎擊彈頭係RPG/ATGM上方自爆,以碎片引爆RPG/ATGM

屈機的是: The system has an automatic reloading mechanism that can handle multiple attacks, and can simultaneously engage several threats, while the armored vehicle is on the move.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TROPHY_Active_Protection_System

[ 本帖最後由 -l- 於 28-1-2007 08:45 編輯 ]
作者: 莊家-犯罪無間    時間: 28-1-2007 13:11

引用:
原帖由 -l- 於 28-1-2007 08:38 發表

係! 迎擊彈頭係RPG/ATGM上方自爆,以碎片引爆RPG/ATGM

屈機的是: The system has an automatic reloading mechanism that can handle multiple attacks, and can simultaneously engage several threats, w ...
同時間飛10個唔同方向的rpg佢可以擋到[]
作者: mujiadam    時間: 28-1-2007 23:55

講...係無敵的
作者: WAIKO01    時間: 29-1-2007 01:38

以色列: 瞄準!!在伊泥沼中的美佬.
作者: WAIKO01    時間: 29-1-2007 01:43

未看片前還是看好的,但看過後發現和用激光反空襲火箭彈一樣:理論歸理論,現實歸現實.
作者: 14692    時間: 29-1-2007 05:36

冇電都係一件垃圾....
作者: -l-    時間: 29-1-2007 07:34

引用:
原帖由 WAIKO01 於 29-1-2007 01:38 發表
以色列: 瞄準!!在伊泥沼中的美佬.
自大(私)的美佬國防部可能不要,因為.......
MSNBC has reported that there is resistance to incorporating TROPHY in the US Army. The U.S. Department of Defense has contracted with Raytheon to develop an equivalent system, which will not be ready before 2011 at the earliest (but now declines to say whether it still is on course to meet that deadline),[1] whereas TROPHY could be deployed much sooner. According to MSNBC's sources, the reason for not adopting TROPHY for now is that it would remove the need for the Raytheon program, causing it to be canceled.
苦了兵哥們[]
引用:
原帖由 WAIKO01 於 29-1-2007 01:43 發表
未看片前還是看好的,但看過後發現和用激光反空襲火箭彈一樣:理論歸理論,現實歸現實.
已經在測試中了,未來可能裝在Blackhawk一類的直升機上

俄佬也有開發「鬥技場」系統去保護在城鎮作戰中的裝甲單位
--->http://armor.kiev.ua/fofanov/Tanks/EQP/arena.html
作者: 14692    時間: 29-1-2007 08:01

引用:
原帖由 -l- 於 29-1-2007 07:34 發表

自大(私)的美佬國防部可能不要,因為.......
MSNBC has reported that there is resistance to incorporating TROPHY in the US Army. The U.S. Department of Defense has contracted with Raytheon to deve ...
heli用....如果用25mm以下既口徑彈藥攻擊佢, 都係冇用[]
作者: Henry    時間: 29-1-2007 08:12

it's magic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
作者: -l-    時間: 29-1-2007 21:26

引用:
原帖由 14692 於 29-1-2007 08:01 發表

heli用....如果用25mm以下既口徑彈藥攻擊佢, 都係冇用
講真,比着你係裝甲兵/heli乘員,就算個Active Protection system只當到30％o既導彈攻擊,你想吾想要先?[]
作者: ZaMaR    時間: 29-1-2007 23:14

引用:
原帖由 -l- 於 29-1-2007 21:26 發表

講真,比着你係裝甲兵/heli乘員,就算個Active Protection system只當到30％o既導彈攻擊,你想吾想要先?
有好過冇[]
作者: WAIKO01    時間: 30-1-2007 00:38

引用:
原帖由 -l- 於 29-1-2007 07:34 發表

自大(私)的美佬國防部可能不要,因為.......
MSNBC has reported that there is resistance to incorporating TROPHY in the US Army. The U.S. Department of Defense has contracted with Raytheon to develop an equivalent system, which will not be ready before 2011 at the earliest (but now declines to say whether it still is on course to meet that deadline),[1] whereas TROPHY could be deployed much sooner. According to MSNBC's sources, the reason for not adopting TROPHY for now is that it would remove the need for the Raytheon program, causing it to be canceled.
苦了兵哥們
但我相信最後會和ERA的結果一樣[]
作者: 14692    時間: 30-1-2007 05:39     標題: 回覆 #17 -l- 的帖子

好過冇......



歡迎光臨 CGF (http://wargamehk.com/cgf/) Powered by Discuz! 6.0.0