發新話題
打印

美國政府起訴EOTech欺詐罪

美國政府起訴EOTech欺詐罪

L3 將要賠償2千5百多萬美金
L3 被查出 EOTech 內紅點在產品敘述中宣稱可在低溫(-40 度 C) 及高濕度環境下使用, 並沒有經過實際測試.
EOTech內部 memo 也早就指出這個問題
市面上已經有多起紅點偏移案例
這對美國軍警使用者可造成嚴重的後果
在美國境內手中有EOTech 內紅點的人可以直接聯絡 EOTech 要求退錢 (refund)

UPDATED – US Government Sues L3 Communications for Fraud Involving EOTech Sights – L3 Settles for $25.6 Million

We can finally tell you the rest of the story regarding L3 Communications’ EOTech Sights.  The Department of Justice has been investigating EOTech for some time and has finally filed suit (US v. L-3 Communications EOTech Inc., 15-cv-09262) in US District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

Specifically, the Government’s allegations concentrate on the performance of the Holographic Weapon Sights at temperature extremes as well as in high moisture environments. The Government also claims that EOTEch failed to disclose testing that demonstrated the inaccuracy issues in those environments.

In addition to naming L-3 and EOTech as defendants in the Government’s suit, they also named EOTech’s president, Paul Mangano which isn’t very common. They are seeking unspecified triple damages plus civil penalties of as much as $11,000 for each fraudulent claim.

L-3 has been aware of the pending action, having mentioned the issue in their July 2015 SEC filing as well as setting aside $26 million.

Update – By mid-afternoon, L-3 had settled with the government for $25.6 million which clearly indicates L-3 has known since summer how much the US Government would be willing to accept in relief. Their quick action helped turn a drop in stock value of more than 6% at mid-day, yet they still closed the day down from opening prices.

What remains, is for L-3 to answer to domestic consumers, state and local governments as well as international customers.

Below is the filing. In suggest you read it. The Government’s case is compelling.

http://www.arms-cool.net/forum/thread-168628-1-1.html
http://soldiersystems.net/2015/1 ... ving-eotech-sights/


欺詐
DIY : 紙上得來終覺淺, 絕知此事要躬身 !

《河湟有感》司空圖
一自蕭關起戰塵,河湟隔斷異鄉春。漢兒盡作胡兒語,卻向城頭罵漢人。

TOP

咁COPY果D點計

可能準過原廠

TOP

copy係另一件事嘛,至少真槍好少用,美國政府更唔會用
引用:
原帖由 secure31 於 13-1-2016 10:16 發表
咁COPY果D點計

可能準過原廠

TOP

美國海外都有得退??

TOP

引用:
原帖由 louisli 於 13-1-2016 11:17 發表
copy係另一件事嘛,至少真槍好少用,美國政府更唔會用
真槍好少用EOTech?美國政府唔會用EOTech?
DIY : 紙上得來終覺淺, 絕知此事要躬身 !

《河湟有感》司空圖
一自蕭關起戰塵,河湟隔斷異鄉春。漢兒盡作胡兒語,卻向城頭罵漢人。

TOP

不,special force大部份都有用Eotech。
引用:
原帖由 sovietarmy2012 於 18-1-2016 06:13 發表

真槍好少用EOTech?美國政府唔會用EOTech?
究竟世界上還有神嗎?

TOP

回覆 5# 的帖子

我諗ching指緊copy鏡用落真槍度

TOP

i return my Eotech. overall, the battery life suck.



[ 本帖最後由 AICSman 於 19-1-2016 09:18 編輯 ]

TOP

陰謀論去睇,係唔係講唔掂數?
有張標不歡而散
之前有利益輸送,而家反面或者某(幾個)政府官員失勢或被舉報?
http://www.wargamehk.com/cgf/viewthread.php?tid=120693&extra=page%3D1
閱讀權限20還真不容易, 呃權限亂吹, 不用太上心

TOP

引用:
原帖由 暈又暈 於 19-1-2016 12:41 發表
陰謀論去睇,係唔係講唔掂數?
有張標不歡而散
之前有利益輸送,而家反面或者某(幾個)政府官員失勢或被舉報?
咁都要真係有野先比人陰到

TOP

引用:
原帖由 secure31 於 13-1-2016 10:16 發表
咁COPY果D點計

可能準過原廠
咪係咯,禾都係受害者.
FBC1

TOP

之前都係用eotech
轉左行玩MRO

TOP

發新話題