發新話題
打印

Oakley unsurpassed impact protection

Oakley unsurpassed impact protection

i just saw at oakley site,it say all M frame lens is "unsurpassed impact protection" (未超越撞擊保護), so why we will choose this for war game..

B4 i broke 2 lens when i played below 2J games.I try to make exchange at oakley.HK,but they delined.And they sent my lens to USA,then the result is no exchange , cox i bought it over a year,so the lens just protect my eyes one years?

If you ar me , what will you do ,make a complaint or still use oakley in games?I really cant trust oakley anymore.
____________

[ 本帖最後由 EF+LOK 於 28-3-2010 20:47 編輯 ]

附件

49418a359b73c.jpg (9.07 KB)

28-3-2010 18:32

49418a359b73c.jpg

TOP

唔出奇啦...我上次用支aeg....打0.3g彈1j力
~4m到打裂左副oakley

TOP

其實佢塊lens 過唔過到Z87.2003?

TOP

i think only SI ballistic could pass impact test.

TOP

TOP

因為膠會舊化
所以無論你用咩牌子
佢都會叫你用一段時間就要換

TOP

引用:
原帖由 EF+LOK 於 28-3-2010 18:28 發表
i just saw at oakley site,it say all M frame lens is "unsurpassed impact protection" (未超越撞擊保護), so why we will choose this for war game..

B4 i broke 2 lens when i played below 2J games.I ...
你講副m frame 係 si m frame , 2個product 尼

TOP

自己要用, 自已負責...

TOP

試下用第二個排子la

TOP

我果副吉打都用左5 6年
用到有一層野係面  我諗都係時候換

TOP

發新話題