20 12
發新話題
打印

Kar.98K Mauser

引用:
原帖由 MANKF 於 18-6-2011 13:03 發表
Thanks Natrium C-Hing's info.  The first stock should be an earlier period produced wood stock - may be from 1934 - 37, from the wood stock mark no. and the wood itself, it seems to be a former Polish ...
From what I heard CAW was using the mold of CMC, and CAW was closely related to Tanaka, thus modding them into real stock should be not a big problem
It would be strange with a Wz29 without finger Grooves
If you are able to find a Real Steel receiver, just keep it and do not mod it into a model gun receiver

TOP

CMC 個MARKING可以拎部磨機磨左佢
不過玩得發燒D, 係合法的大前提下
可以拎CMC個RECEIVER 去搵D公司
用鋁/鋼照做一

TOP

回覆 16# 的帖子

Completely agree with you Natrium C-Hing!  From my understanding.  CMC firstly made these mouldings, after CMC closed down, these mouldings are in the hand of CAW and continue the production,  so the mouldings are the same.
Concerning the 1st woodstock, I also want to know more,  I will put more photos with markings on this stock.  Hope you can give me more valuable comments.
By the way, better play safe and legally, with all these front band, rings ...and wood stock, I'm more than happy already

TOP

回覆 17# 的帖子

Andy C-Hing, 我都係咁諗...買個玩具CMC or CAW receiver & bolt番离,照copy個鋼嘅換上去,當然車埋條barrel換晒啲front sight同rear sight.  但如果咁做....有冇人買番我copy完果支玩具先  因為成本都幾高,同幾浪費。所以仍在鬪爭中

TOP

引用:
原帖由 MANKF 於 18-6-2011 22:13 發表
Andy C-Hing, 我都係咁諗...買個玩具CMC or CAW receiver & bolt番离,照copy個鋼嘅換上去,當然車埋條barrel換晒啲front sight同rear sight.  但如果咁做....有冇人買番我copy完果支玩具先  因為成本 ...
浪費係絕對唔會
你有埋set玩具係度
仲要keep齊整ga單
可以做一個證明
唔係到時檢控問...
how to prove 你呢個receiver 同bolt係假,只係一個玩具的仿製品?
要證明起上黎,咪煩d

TOP

 20 12
發新話題