shingfd

awesome photos and comparisons
appreciate OP's effort

shingfd

引用:

原帖由 loveless 於 15-10-2013 16:53 發表
hey you're the dude asking about glare on replica eotechs

yup i am
and in the end im going to get myself a genuine aimpoint instead haha
the eotechs laying around here (in shops as well as the 2nd hand mkt) are IMHO way over-priced

(recently got an inforce wml w/ thorntail offset so am into flashlights currently )

im not sure how many users here truly understand and appreciate the thoughtfulness of ur tests. would sure love to see other tests as well. these posts are oasis to a desert

[ 本帖最後由 shingfd 於 16-10-2013 09:36 編輯 ]

shingfd

hey OP, since you have both a cmore and seemore, and that you have mentioned the lenses is an important factor deciding the quality of the sights, would it be possible that tuning the position of the dot (away from the "centre") on the seemore would potentially create a more serious parallax? if so, would that further emphasize the advantage of cmore?

also, the dot is a bit off for the cmore on the 5th photo. that angle seems to be a typical angle when aiming down the sight with the mask getting in the way between the cheek and stock. would this suggest that, even using genuine sights, that the mount should be relatively taller or pushing the sight further to the front to reduce parallax?

shingfd

haha not sure if u've watched this movie before but it kinda inspired me to place the cmore at an rather forward position
http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/Punisher:_War_Zone#AR-15_variant

but as u've said, much of this decision is about personal preference (although i've also heard that some instructors claim that having the sight further down reduces potential obstruction on the peripheral view...)

anyway, look forward to ur future tests!!