Tekkno

It is to protect our constitution rights! The rights to bear arms shall not be infringed!

Tekkno

They are taking away my rights by limiting my magazine capacity and banning a certain "style" of weapons.

i remember by definition they are referring "arms" as common weapon used by the military.   Semi-automatic weapons are not even weapons used by military. why should they ban them just because they LOOK EVIL with a plastic pistol grip on it?

Tekkno

Well destructive device is another story but tell me, why do you think banning a certain kind of "eveil looking" rifle will solve the current issue?
rermeber only 300-400 people in a year was murdered by long guns. much less than other weapons such as knifes.
I am not trying to argue with you Ching but i just want to know how people on the democratic side thinks

Tekkno

引用:

原帖由 loveless 於 12-2-2013 15:35 發表
destrutive devices are what military is about, how is that being another story?
So on one hand you define arms as military weapons, which you so fiercely oppose being taken away from you, yet at the  ...

Destructive device was banned( higly regulated)since 1934, I personally think it is okay for people have such device if they are in good hand. Same goes with semi auto fireamrs, I feel safer when good people with guns around me.
Let the government tyranny thing left a side first but self defense is the most valid argument for us to bare arms.
I personally is pro gun. I would rather count on a 1911 than 911.
Remember police do not have the obligation to save your life and when seconds count, police are only minutes away!
I don't see the need for a so called "assault weapon" ban , the word assault weapon is created by the democrats and the pro democratic media.
I think we have the ability to know what is a real assault weapons and what is a civilian sporting rifle.