-l-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsJLHX7gxxg

-l-

引用:

原帖由 gtoray 於 28-1-2007 04:27 發表


有冇咁快反應啊?

會唔會係利用引爆方式?

係! 迎擊彈頭係RPG/ATGM上方自爆,以碎片引爆RPG/ATGM

屈機的是: The system has an automatic reloading mechanism that can handle multiple attacks, and can simultaneously engage several threats, while the armored vehicle is on the move.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TROPHY_Active_Protection_System

[ 本帖最後由 -l- 於 28-1-2007 08:45 編輯 ]

-l-

引用:

原帖由 WAIKO01 於 29-1-2007 01:38 發表
以色列: 瞄準!!在伊泥沼中的美佬.

自大(私)的美佬國防部可能不要,因為.......
MSNBC has reported that there is resistance to incorporating TROPHY in the US Army. The U.S. Department of Defense has contracted with Raytheon to develop an equivalent system, which will not be ready before 2011 at the earliest (but now declines to say whether it still is on course to meet that deadline),[1] whereas TROPHY could be deployed much sooner. According to MSNBC's sources, the reason for not adopting TROPHY for now is that it would remove the need for the Raytheon program, causing it to be canceled.
苦了兵哥們[]

引用:

原帖由 WAIKO01 於 29-1-2007 01:43 發表
未看片前還是看好的,但看過後發現和用激光反空襲火箭彈一樣:理論歸理論,現實歸現實.

已經在測試中了,未來可能裝在Blackhawk一類的直升機上

俄佬也有開發「鬥技場」系統去保護在城鎮作戰中的裝甲單位
--->http://armor.kiev.ua/fofanov/Tanks/EQP/arena.html

-l-

引用:

原帖由 14692 於 29-1-2007 08:01 發表

heli用....如果用25mm以下既口徑彈藥攻擊佢, 都係冇用

講真,比着你係裝甲兵/heli乘員,就算個Active Protection system只當到30％o既導彈攻擊,你想吾想要先?[]