pbay

今次事件不同之處 :
有當地居民使用Assault Rifle向槍手還擊

槍手響警方未到場前已經中槍死亡

pbay

引用:

原帖由 walther 於 6-11-2017 10:32 發表
係美國可能真係要隨身帶槍, 去教堂同返學都唔例外. 學校其實應該將槍械使用列入課程範圍內.

教堂槍擊案令我諗起King's man

pbay

引用:

原帖由 jn_jona 於 6-11-2017 16:31 發表

講起黑幫 我諗近十年黑幫拎老牛殺人既案件真係少之又少
鐵通老牛都只係用黎傷人嚇下人 用不著手羅命 又何必要買槍呢?
南亞仔另計

以前香港黑社會都幾狠架, 不時用槍殺仇家,
e.g. search下灣仔之虎睇佢中左幾多槍

不過依家唔洗動刀動槍啦, 背靠某國, 出黎凶下細路打下市民又有飯食.

[ 本帖最後由 pbay 於 6-11-2017 16:59 編輯 ]

pbay

美國用槍打走殖民者換來獨立,
亦在內戰後用擁槍權同保留反政府權利, 換來聯邦制同國家和解唔再分裂.
槍對於美式自由有好大象徵性.
歷史軌跡使然, 無得好講.

淨係睇呢一刻, 美國人的確付緊好大代價去維持呢種象徵意義, 好似好唔值,
但如果拉返闊睇一百幾十年,  極權先係最強殺人武器,
獨裁者一個政策就殺4千萬人, 一聲令下又殺幾百萬知識份子,
難道呢D代價又唔嚴重 ?  

要計數應該咁計:
一個政策死4千幾萬, 除68年專制統治, 每年死58萬幾, 每日死1600人, 每小時67人

咁計美國佬又好似除笨有精wor

pbay

引用:

原帖由 Opica 於 7-11-2017 17:03 發表
http://www.dailywire.com/news/23 ... ructor-hank-berrien
I grabbed a handful of ammunition and started loading my magazine. And I’m trying to survey the situation, not knowing what’s going on; and then I saw a man in a black tactical helmet with a dark-shaded helmet on, and obviously looked to me like it was a bulletproof vest. He had a pistol in his hand, and we exchanged gunfire. And I was standing behind a pickup truck for cover, and we exchanged fire. He saw me, and I saw him, I’m like, it was surreal to me; it couldn’t be happening. I couldn’t believe it. I know I hit him. He got into his vehicle, and he fired another couple rounds through his side window. When the window dropped, I fired another round at him again.

原來個救人英雄係 NRA instructor   
NRA 美國全國步槍協會, 平時俾左翼日日小, 日日鬧. 今次終於立左件功績.

今次個槍手有備而來, 全幅武裝有晒避彈衣頭盔,
如果唔係有呢個訓練有素既教練在場阻止, 俾個槍手玩多十幾分鐘等警察慢慢到場, 隨時死多一倍人