Hkpolice-Psu

引用:

原帖由 Pvt.King 於 3-1-2010 23:24 發表

我覺得呢支似5.56多d...

係似SAM-R(美) / SECTION 5(英)
不過係16吋管, 睇個mag well係似5.56

重點係, 支新槍應該係
"single-piece upper receiver and free-floating"

所以呢支用ff ras ge應該就唔係支l129a1喇

得睇過內文後覺得佢介紹sr25多過支新槍...

唔知點解, 我覺得支l129a1應該係呢支...

2009shotshow01162009018.jpg (225.35 KB)

4-1-2010 13:42

Hkpolice-Psu

引用:

原帖由 derek 於 4-1-2010 14:16 發表
又話16吋"黑色"不鏽鋼槍管 ?

pls have a look for this

引用:

http://www.janes.com/news/defence/jdw/jdw091229_1_n.shtml

Features of the weapon include a single-piece upper receiver and free-floating, quick-change barrels available in 305 mm, 406 mm and 508 mm. It has four Picatinny rails with a 540 mm top rail for night vision, thermal and image intensifying optics. Stock options include fixed or retractable versions.

Hkpolice-Psu

引用:

原帖由 m913282 於 19-1-2010 21:43 發表
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1244085/British-troops-new-Sharpshooter-rifle-blast-Taliban-half-mile-away.html

This is another one?

i guess that's the same one as the topic talking about

Hkpolice-Psu

引用:

原帖由 queen 於 19-1-2010 13:07 發表


For MG....is very useful.....But....for a Semi-Auto Rifle...................................................

引用:

原帖由 MG-42 於 20-1-2010 00:17 發表
其實M4系槍械甚至新型突擊步槍(eg.Steyr AUG,ACR...etc)可以比你快換槍管既用意,其實係比你可以快速根據不同任務換standard,carbine,compact長度barrel為主要目的....與機槍用意有分別,不過機槍正常都唔會用free floating設計,亦冇意思,而且free floating都負荷不到機槍既重槍管及極高既損耗...

唔知英佬會唔會得閒換下carbine管當7.62NATO assault rifle用一雞兩味...砌枝UK SCAR-H

that's exactly what i wanna say, depends on different purpose to use the suitable barrel.