發新話題
打印

真係甘神?(馬航事件)

真係甘神?(馬航事件)

吾知真定假,好奇怪...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JpbZZKqxy0

無論如何,希望快D水落石出

[ 本帖最後由 ohnavi 於 11-3-2014 10:16 編輯 ]

TOP

轉貼:
Six important facts you're not being told about lost Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 (脷伸:我聽日去覆診

• Fact #1: All Boeing 777 commercial jets are equipped with black box recorders that can survive any on-board explosion
No explosion from the plane itself can destroy the black box recorders. They are bomb-proof structures that hold digital recordings of cockpit conversations as well as detailed flight data and control surface data.

• Fact #2: All black box recorders transmit locator signals for at least 30 days after falling into the ocean
Yet the black box from this particular incident hasn't been detected at all. That's why investigators are having such trouble finding it. Normally, they only need to "home in" on the black box transmitter signal. But in this case, the absence of a signal means the black box itself -- an object designed to survive powerful explosions -- has either vanished, malfunctioned or been obliterated by some powerful force beyond the worst fears of aircraft design engineers.

• Fact #3: Many parts of destroyed aircraft are naturally bouyant and will float in water
In past cases of aircraft destroyed over the ocean or crashing into the ocean, debris has always been spotted floating on the surface of the water. That's because -- as you may recall from the safety briefing you've learned to ignore -- "your seat cushion may be used as a flotation device."

Yes, seat cushions float. So do many other non-metallic aircraft parts. If Flight 370 was brought down by an explosion of some sort, there would be massive debris floating on the ocean, and that debris would not be difficult to spot. The fact that it has not yet been spotted only adds to the mystery of how Flight 370 appears to have literally vanished from the face of the Earth.

• Fact #4: If a missile destroyed Flight 370, the missile would have left a radar signature
One theory currently circulating on the 'net is that a missile brought down the airliner, somehow blasting the aircraft and all its contents to "s mithereens" -- which means very tiny pieces of matter that are undetectable as debris.

The problem with this theory is that there exists no known ground-to-air or air-to-air missile with such a capability. All known missiles generate tremendous debris when they explode on target. Both the missile and the debris produce very large radar signatures which would be easily visible to both military vessels and air traffic authorities.

• Fact #5: The location of the aircraft when it vanished is not a mystery
Air traffic controllers have full details of almost exactly where the aircraft was at the moment it vanished. They know the location, elevation and airspeed -- three pieces of information which can readily be used to estimate the likely location of debris.

Remember: air safety investigators are not stupid people. They've seen mid-air explosions before, and they know how debris falls. There is already a substantial data set of airline explosions and crashes from which investigators can make well-educated guesses about where debris should be found. And yet, even armed with all this experience and information, they remain totally baffled on what happened to Flight 370.

• Fact #6: If Flight 370 was hijacked, it would not have vanished from radar
Hijacking an airplane does not cause it to simply vanish from radar. Even if transponders are disabled on the aircraft, ground radar can still readily track the location of the aircraft using so-called "passive" radar (classic ground-based radar systems that emit a signal and monitor its reflection).

Thus, the theory that the flight was hijacked makes no sense whatsoever. When planes are hijacked, they do not magically vanish from radar.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/04424 ... .html#ixzz2vcQ171EG

[ 本帖最後由 ohnavi 於 11-3-2014 10:53 編輯 ]

TOP

引用:
原帖由 RCman 於 11-3-2014 12:40 發表
我試過兩次係比較不安。
一次係由香港直航北海道。
起飛後約兩小時,聞到些燒焦味....跟住係福岡機場急降,機場有十多部消防車等待。
另一次係由東京成田機場回港。起飛後二十分鐘左右,特然有一次約兩三秒的Free ...
哇甘真係好驚喎

TOP

其實今次甘多國家軍隊高調參與,算吾算史無前例?
又衛星又戰艦又潛艇又飛機,會吾會有內情?
有消息指佢地搜索馬六甲海峽,明明吾係飛果邊,點解會搜索果邊?

TOP

引用:
原帖由 gtoray 於 11-3-2014 20:22 發表


睇下睇下
其實個flightradar24會唔會唔係好準確?

我覺得個圖顯示過yellow spot既飛機, 之後都會好奇怪
例如 0:25 , 轉過yellow spot之後就好似short左咁, 以不可能的速度反方向飛行後消失
同1:55右邊,  轉 ...
我都覺佢窒窒下

TOP

引用:
原帖由 JBL 於 11-3-2014 19:38 發表


路透社引述馬來西亞軍方消息報道,軍方相信,雷達曾經追蹤到客機

在馬六甲海峽上空飛過,同客機在東部

同控制塔最後聯絡的地點相距很遠。

報道說,客機飛過東部哥打巴魯後改變

航線,低飛進入馬六甲 ...
哇峰迴路轉

TOP

引用:
原帖由 carl 於 12-3-2014 00:06 發表
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNZtz-HVy6c
有另一條UPDATE 片.
果度係三亞對出?

似吾似刼機?然後有軍機escort到三亞迫降卅擊落?

[ 本帖最後由 ohnavi 於 12-3-2014 11:18 編輯 ]

TOP

引用:
原帖由 sovietarmy2012 於 13-3-2014 19:13 發表
飛行紀錄儀竟然可以關掉....呢個乜X野設計泥ga
照計無可能關架喎

TOP

真係痴孖筋7個鐘油環遊世界甘濟

TOP

如果是陰毛論,個幾禮拜大家遊完花園有時間清理晒所有野各國傾掂晒數,
現在公佈話墜機,搵殘骸慢慢黎得閒又可以話搵到D,然後人們漸漸淡忘。

如果真的是劫機加墜機,2xx多人是很不幸的一群,
RIP

TOP

發新話題