發新話題
打印

核動力戰略轟炸機

引用:
原帖由 sovietarmy2012 於 10-6-2014 23:24 發表

永動機係由幾百年前開始講...水轉油就係90年代果班磚家+騙子吹
永動機同水轉油技術某程度係存在的,
只是有好多原因暫時不可能被普及,
正如柴油引擎普及阻難重重。

http://www.quantumhydrogen.com

TOP

與其用核動力,不如研究下反重力好過啦

TOP

引用:
原帖由 sovietarmy2012 於 11-6-2014 12:32 發表

永動機違反物理定律喎
或者說是違反現在所知的物理定律吧,
我們對現今人類掌握的科技所知極少,
沒掌握既更可以無限想像,
50年前我們都沒有隱型技術和電磁炮啦,
我都是討論下

TOP

引用:
原帖由 cccarlos 於 11-6-2014 14:39 發表
The energy you can harvest by burning H2 and 0.5*O2 would be less than or equal to the energy required to electrolyze H2O.
yes but its better to have someone to start on it,
plus i can see one of the point of this company is protection of the environment, not just only energy.
or we keep sticking to oil, coal & nuclear controlled by those big company.
but IMO - free energy or just cheaper - won't be 'allowed' at the end of the day.

anyway i'm not pro in that, so pls feel free to comment.

[ 本帖最後由 ohnavi 於 11-6-2014 14:57 編輯 ]

TOP

發新話題