發新話題
打印

端午節晚又玩碟仙

引用:
原帖由 McDull 於 18-6-2010 21:42 發表
如果咁講,邊個最早發明摺西個個咪發達。。。。。
吾關摺事,比較似係彈

TOP

無事?睇下咩啦...
天下文章一大抄(借孖通兄資料一用)
Date: Friday, July 17, 2009
Title: A.R.M.S. Inc. wins Trade Secret and Breach of Fiduciary Duty Lawsuit against Stephen P. Troy, Jr. and Troy Industries, Inc..
Sub-title: Jury in United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts awards A.R.M.S., Inc. $1.8M in weapons accessory trial.


(West Bridgewater, MA)  - A federal court jury awarded  A.R.M.S. Inc., a designer of accessories and attachments for small arms weapons for 30 years,  in excess of $1.8 million in damages in a lawsuit alleging  theft of trade secrets and breach of fiduciary duty against Stephen P. Troy, Jr. and his company, Troy Industries, Inc., of Lee, MA.  In the lawsuit, originally filed on August 23, 2007, A.R.M.S. alleged that its former employee of seven months, Stephen Troy, who had held a position of trust and confidence with the company, had stolen A.R.M.S.'s trade secrets for a proprietary handguard system for use on M-4/M-16/AR-15 rifles and incorporated those trade secrets in a competing modular, free-float railed handguard system that attached to the barrel nut and that was being offered and sold by Troy Industries, commencing after he was fired from A.R.M.S..  On June 26, 2009, after a two-week trial in the Massachusetts Federal District Court, a nine member federal jury returned a verdict against Stephen P. Troy and Troy Industries, finding them liable for misappropriation of trade secrets and breach of fiduciary duty.  Richard Swan, the president of A.R.M.S.R Inc., said, "We are pleased that the jury upheld our trade secret rights and determined that our former employee and his company should not profit from the theft of our trade secrets."   Amongst others, witnesses for A.R.M.S. included two representatives of the U.S. military.  Other issues in the case remain pending before the Court

[ 本帖最後由 ohnavi 於 21-6-2010 14:37 編輯 ]

TOP

引用:
原帖由 McDull 於 21-6-2010 14:32 發表
做埋佢

ARMS係咪想獨霸彈西市場
無咩獨吾獨霸既,問題係ARMS確係註冊左,
知識產權在美國係好嚴謹的,CP早排都告完一輪啦,
其實吾係壞事,可以對原設計者保障多D

TOP

引用:
原帖由 ayaka 於 21-6-2010 14:45 發表

無錯....US的係懲罰性
所以美佬見到PATENT就怕
在文明既法治社會,好事黎既

TOP

回覆 18# 的帖子

of course la 創造就業機會麻
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_attorney

TOP

回覆 20# 的帖子

我肯定有好多大公司有成個部門做呢D野,
玩下手告人好過出產品,或者都係重要收入來源

TOP

回覆 24# 的帖子

如果為保護知識產權都算好事黎既

TOP

回覆 27# 的帖子

係!好多人發現原來搵到食,就漸漸濫用了「人權」,之前都聽好多好離譜。

但老實講,這種保障,對一般平民來講,係有好過無的。
點都好過有事起黎,叫天不應叫地不聞。

其實小弟幾吾鍾意美國(政府),但網上同佢地買得野多,
體驗到美國人做生意非常甘誠實(最少我遇到都係),
寄吾寄得有咩風險有咩收費講得好清楚,有果句講果句,
淨呢樣我地國家就落後幾十年...

TOP

回覆 30# 的帖子

甘就有辣有吾辣,師兄當然有你既道理,
但法制好就始終多過選擇,好過patent左都無得告
『有錢佬更加有錢,窮人更加窮』,呢樣就係定律黎架啦

TOP

發新話題