發新話題
打印

中大生瞓街爭男女混宿 挑戰現時宿規 紮營通宵論戰

引用:
原帖由 gd1893 於 15-5-2011 02:01 發表
如果話算係「多左D」我都仲接受到,
反正有時唔係剩係講外表,功夫都好緊要,
再衰D講,好又一餐唔好又一餐....

但去到「脂肪控」呢個層面既話呢....
就只能講你呢個朋友既roommate比較重口味...


後黎呢位"情聖"有幸成為我老友既同房
但佢貌似轉左去女生房間作戰, 變左連機都冇得跟
縮縮北行鳥 =口=

TOP

引用:
原帖由 nishi 於 15-5-2011 02:02 發表


後黎呢位"情聖"有幸成為我老友既同房
但佢貌似轉左去女生房間作戰, 變左連機都冇得跟
請問...有冇機會執佢二灘先

TOP

引用:
原帖由 mujiadam 於 15-5-2011 02:03 發表

請問...有冇機會執佢二灘先
可惜「情聖」已經番左老家了
縮縮北行鳥 =口=

TOP

可以「借宿 / 留宿」既「旅舍」囉....

掉返轉講,大家如果去到間旅舍係去到先知「唔比啪啪啪」的話,
我諗你都會走去大堂同個經理嘈....

大學生,我撐你!

天賦人權豈能剝奪,宿生性交天經地義!
抗議大學禁止宿生扑野!
釋放性能量! 反對白色恐怖,射出白色液體!
還西於能!



(弊,越玩越開心添... )
引用:
原帖由 mujiadam 於 15-5-2011 01:59 發表
先明白"宿舍"係比你做咩先架啦!

TOP

咩地方人士?
引用:
原帖由 nishi 於 15-5-2011 02:06 發表


可惜「情聖」已經番左老家了

TOP

引用:
原帖由 gd1893 於 15-5-2011 02:08 發表
咩地方人士?

貌似東南亞/中東果邊...詳細就唔知嚕...
縮縮北行鳥 =口=

TOP

哦... 咁就完全明白喇...
引用:
原帖由 nishi 於 15-5-2011 02:09 發表


貌似東南亞/中東果邊...詳細就唔知嚕...

TOP

引用:
原帖由 nishi 於 15-5-2011 02:06 發表


可惜「情聖」已經番左老家了
咁果D"戰俘"呢?

TOP

引用:
原帖由 mujiadam 於 15-5-2011 02:12 發表

咁果D"戰俘"呢?
咁就真係完全唔知啦
縮縮北行鳥 =口=

TOP

引用:
原帖由 nishi 於 15-5-2011 02:12 發表


咁就真係完全唔知啦
拉出去斬!!!

TOP

引用:
原帖由 Elf 於 15-5-2011 00:08 發表
i dont get whats the big deal about this. you can always resort to either the girl's or the guy's room..
it's just that hong kong is not that conservative to require a separate homosexual accommodati ...
各處鄉村各處例,毫無疑問香港係性呢方面係比西方國家保守。但係唔應該因為要追及西方文化而改例。

學校應該研究當初定立此校規時嘅理念同價值觀,並檢討其延伸性及精神,方能決定是否應該修例。萬萬不能因為社會言論壓力及學生反抗而屈服,此舉與派六千蚊無異,會損害大學權威性及整個社會的價值觀。

TOP

引用:
原帖由 雙狙翔 於 15-5-2011 01:11 發表


要睇下咩大學同咩系
Getting girls is not only a test of the sociability of a person, it's not only something that judges the attraction of a person.
more over a challenge to the basic instinct of mating.
if we all go back to the basic needs and desire for any animals, that comes right after essential basic needs like food and shelter.
you probably think this is a bit far away, but if a guy cannot pick up anyone in an environment where it's mostly people of same age, socially active and similar background, he has a problem.
引用:
原帖由 marcowong 於 15-5-2011 03:04 發表

各處鄉村各處例,毫無疑問香港係性呢方面係比西方國家保守。但係唔應該因為要追及西方文化而改例。

學校應該研究當初定立此校規時嘅理念同價值觀,並檢討其延伸性及精神,方能決定是否應該修例。萬萬不能 ...
I concur.
Indeed all the students in an university should respect the moral value of the school and society, but in an university it should not be an implementation but rather an interaction.
I'm not sure about HK unis but it's quite important in the West the school listens to sound and logical proposals of student unions (representing the majority of students) before making decisions that affects both school image and students.
Some student unions in the UK have put out their voices so loud that school councils, local councils or even government has to take their opinion into consideration when executing policies.
My point is, in an university, school interacts with students, not control them. I failed to see that happening in the recent history of CUHK, including the 民主女神像, accommodation issues. And IMHO, this failure has led to numerous incidents like the over-the-line sex column in CUHK student union newspaper and the "slogans and activities" they have in orientation camp.

I think the underlying problem is the suppression of student activism exerted by Uni councils and HK government behind them. Afterall, hong kong is a liberal autocracy.
若法律本身就不公義,守法只會淪為社會不公義的助力而已。

TOP

回覆 87# 的帖子

我認同你講既野  
但我吾認同係英國讀大學或者大學生 無性生活就有問題
"seriously if you can't get laid in unis you have a big problem" 大學生等於濫交?
外國人OR 大學吾代表要濫交下話

TOP

引用:
原帖由 雙狙翔 於 15-5-2011 06:14 發表
我認同你講既野  
但我吾認同係英國讀大學或者大學生 無性生活就有問題
"seriously if you can't get laid in unis you have a big problem" 大學生等於濫交?
外國人OR 大學吾代表要濫交下話
溝到女唔代表濫交掛?
若法律本身就不公義,守法只會淪為社會不公義的助力而已。

TOP

引用:
原帖由 Elf 於 15-5-2011 06:33 發表


溝到女唔代表濫交掛?
溝到女梗係吾算  但你係講getting laid

TOP

發新話題