32 123
發新話題
打印

端午節晚又玩碟仙

端午節晚又玩碟仙

MBUS 2






今次靈唔靈

TOP

冇咩性趣...
只係細左...

TOP

回覆 2# 的帖子

細都唔細得去邊,只係薄左DD,唔會頂住好多牌子既MOUNT。

同埋彈起之後高左,可以同M4A1個隻3角旗對返岩高度

TOP

聽落好似吾錯, 又有優點

TOP

回覆 4# 的帖子

我個槍佬成日話MBUS唔夠高

TOP

Date:          Monday, November 30, 2009


(West Bridgewater, MA)  - A.R.M.S. Inc., a designer of accessories and attachments for small arms weapons for 30 years, is pleased to announce that an amicable settlement has been reached with Magpul Industries Corp. concerning Magpul's MBUS plastic, folding rear sight. A.R.M.S. is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 7,356,962 for a low profile flip-up sight and the settlement resolves two federal court cases that concern A.R.M.S. claim of patent infringement. Magpul will resume distributing a modified MBUS folding rear sight that does not infringe the '962 patent. A.R.M.S. vigorously protects its valuable intellectual property rights and is pleased that a mutually agreeable settlement could be reached.  
ARMS Good Ball!!!!


天下文章都係抄, 有趣, 有趣, 怪唔得之早輪出咗改款啦, 原來D膠西都係抄人, 妙呀, 妙呀!!
A.R.M.S.都係US$89/set 當然會好過其它膠西啦, 話哂 [屎温] 點都係老字號起碼唔會"古"佢識唔識彈先吖, 呢個價值頭要支恃原創!!



[url=http://www.armsmounts.com/default.asp?mode=products&sub=sights&id=[hsh]71L-FR%20Set]http://www.armsmounts.com/default.asp?mode=products&sub=sights&id=[hsh]71L-FR%20Set[/url]

TOP

回覆 6# 的帖子

如果咁講,邊個最早發明摺西個個咪發達。。。。。

TOP

越睇佢越似甲蟲

TOP

引用:
原帖由 McDull 於 18-6-2010 21:42 發表
如果咁講,邊個最早發明摺西個個咪發達。。。。。
吾關摺事,比較似係彈

TOP

回覆 9# 的帖子

咁即係TROY個隻用手剔(摺)既咪會無事

TOP

無事?睇下咩啦...
天下文章一大抄(借孖通兄資料一用)
Date: Friday, July 17, 2009
Title: A.R.M.S. Inc. wins Trade Secret and Breach of Fiduciary Duty Lawsuit against Stephen P. Troy, Jr. and Troy Industries, Inc..
Sub-title: Jury in United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts awards A.R.M.S., Inc. $1.8M in weapons accessory trial.


(West Bridgewater, MA)  - A federal court jury awarded  A.R.M.S. Inc., a designer of accessories and attachments for small arms weapons for 30 years,  in excess of $1.8 million in damages in a lawsuit alleging  theft of trade secrets and breach of fiduciary duty against Stephen P. Troy, Jr. and his company, Troy Industries, Inc., of Lee, MA.  In the lawsuit, originally filed on August 23, 2007, A.R.M.S. alleged that its former employee of seven months, Stephen Troy, who had held a position of trust and confidence with the company, had stolen A.R.M.S.'s trade secrets for a proprietary handguard system for use on M-4/M-16/AR-15 rifles and incorporated those trade secrets in a competing modular, free-float railed handguard system that attached to the barrel nut and that was being offered and sold by Troy Industries, commencing after he was fired from A.R.M.S..  On June 26, 2009, after a two-week trial in the Massachusetts Federal District Court, a nine member federal jury returned a verdict against Stephen P. Troy and Troy Industries, finding them liable for misappropriation of trade secrets and breach of fiduciary duty.  Richard Swan, the president of A.R.M.S.R Inc., said, "We are pleased that the jury upheld our trade secret rights and determined that our former employee and his company should not profit from the theft of our trade secrets."   Amongst others, witnesses for A.R.M.S. included two representatives of the U.S. military.  Other issues in the case remain pending before the Court

[ 本帖最後由 ohnavi 於 21-6-2010 14:37 編輯 ]

TOP

回覆 11# 的帖子

做埋佢

ARMS係咪想獨霸彈西市場

TOP

引用:
原帖由 McDull 於 21-6-2010 14:32 發表
做埋佢

ARMS係咪想獨霸彈西市場
無咩獨吾獨霸既,問題係ARMS確係註冊左,
知識產權在美國係好嚴謹的,CP早排都告完一輪啦,
其實吾係壞事,可以對原設計者保障多D

TOP

引用:
原帖由 ohnavi 於 21-6-2010 14:36 發表


無咩獨吾獨霸既,問題係ARMS確係註冊左,
知識產權在美國係好嚴謹的,CP早排都告完一輪啦,
其實吾係壞事,可以對原設計者保障多D
無錯....US的係懲罰性
所以美佬見到PATENT就怕

TOP

引用:
原帖由 ohnavi 於 21-6-2010 14:36 發表
無咩獨吾獨霸既,問題係ARMS確係註冊左,
知識產權在美國係好嚴謹的,CP早排都告完一輪啦,
其實吾係壞事,可以對原設計者保障多D
當然,好野係應該支持原創既

唔知呢幾間廠最後會唔會DEAL得埋欄呢

TOP

 32 123
發新話題