16 12
發新話題
打印

Real eotech or real aimpoint?

Real eotech or real aimpoint?

Real eotech or real aimpoint?

TOP

Trijicon好

[ 本帖最後由 rYaN 於 18-9-2011 03:00 編輯 ]

TOP

Both are excellent optics, both are very rugged, both are combat tested. The only real difference in terms of performance, is that eotech holographic sight has parallax while aimpint is parallax free. Meaning that shooters using an aimpoint, can maintain the rifle's accuracy even when not perfectly align with the sight. That's one reason I run a M68, but eotech are great sights too.

TOP

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

TOP

引用:
原帖由 rYaN 於 18-9-2011 02:58 發表
Trijicon好
買左支red dot先買Accupoint

TOP

引用:
原帖由 tigerdan 於 18-9-2011 03:08 發表
Both are excellent optics, both are very rugged, both are combat tested. The only real difference in terms of performance, is that eotech holographic sight has parallax while aimpint is parallax free. ...
Is Eotech heavy ?

TOP

引用:
原帖由 MG-42 於 18-9-2011 03:36 發表
Aimpoint 用唔同mount ring變化多,多槍可裝
Eotech都好,但有D槍裝會太高,如G36,AUG,P90,MP5,AK,MP7,G3  (以貼住腮瞄準計)
我用PTW

TOP

I think it's a matter of personal preference. I have 551, 557 and Comp M2. I love them all. Eotech tends to give you a bigger sight picture.

TOP

By the way, I'm using them for my PTWs and M4 GBBs

TOP

引用:
原帖由 Ancestor 於 18-9-2011 03:56 發表

我用PTW
aimpoint

eotech低到无伦,带mask极唔方便(可能小弟面长?)
Systema all the way. Porsche all the way....

TOP

Honestly it's just a matter of preference, there is no point to debate which is better.
I have a compM3 right now, but i'm also planning to get a eotech xps in the near future.

TOP

我鍾意eo tech多過aimpoint,因為貪佢易睇同易買電(552計)
Never Forget

TOP

將會由EOTECH轉用AIMPOINT

TOP

引用:
原帖由 Pan 於 18-9-2011 11:39 發表
我鍾意eo tech多過aimpoint,因為貪佢易睇同易買電(552計)
aimpoint comp M4都係aa
不過我鍾意伊奧踢多d

TOP

睇唔慣Eotech個reticle, 太大粒 (雖然有其他款揀)
個人喜歡aimpoint t-1 / aimpoint m4s

TOP

 16 12
發新話題