kongchak

中共既思想控制真係做得好好~
然而你要明白中國人既命係唔值錢既~內至各種既販賣人口器官  外至IS 殺害中國公民 中國統治者只係強烈譴責!!強烈譴責!!
我真係唔明點解可以有咁多人聽到中國差差差就高潮,唔可以接受現實.
如果可以既話我都想愛國~

48191

怎麼這份報告和我那份出入那麼大？

引用:

原帖由 Lolanto 於 9-10-2016 04:44 發表
我唔係好識睇簡體字，紅色個幾句唔知佢講乜

7月23日报道，南苏丹首都朱巴发生激烈武装冲突后，来自英国、德国和瑞典的12名维和警察在没有与联 ...

48191

中國作為聯合國安理會五大常任理事國，在聯合國的軍事及人道救援工作上理應出多點力。不是嗎？

引用:

原帖由 FBC1 於 9-10-2016 04:45 發表
維和部隊係好睇,但唔好食.

FBC1

引用:

原帖由 48191 於 9-10-2016 09:36 發表
中國作為聯合國安理會五大常任理事國，在聯合國的軍事及人道救援工作上理應出多點力。不是嗎？

我同意,我意思係呢種任務吃力不討好而巳.

Hamlet

引用:

原帖由 48191 於 9-10-2016 09:36 發表
中國作為聯合國安理會五大常任理事國，在聯合國的軍事及人道救援工作上理應出多點力。不是嗎？

除佐南蘇丹之外，非洲有老解參與聯合國部隊既仲有馬里、利比里亞、剛果，不過單純作戰部隊既就係南蘇丹，其他係工兵、輜重兵同軍醫，利比里亞無記錯既話仲有一隊公安防暴隊參加埋。

就非洲黎講最活躍嗰五常係法國，因為嗰頭以前唔少佢殖民地，但法國人個行動唔係聯合國委任，完全自己意志支配。至於美國，索馬里嗰次之後對派遣軍隊干預非洲內戰既嘢亦無興趣，有馬後砲話過，當年盧旺達大屠殺如果美國直接出兵干預做架兩，無死得咁多人。

Hamlet

引用:

原帖由 FBC1 於 9-10-2016 09:42 發表

我同意,我意思係呢種任務吃力不討好而巳.

聯合國維和部隊最活躍既一個國家其實係巴基斯坦，但佢個動機就唔講得上偉大，佢係為佐出人出鎗黎頂番要交既會費，有多當賺老美咁⋯⋯

tinyau1134

引用:

原帖由 48191 於 8-10-2016 22:36 發表
因為在Facebook中，有人總結了號稱「世界第二強國」的軍隊表現：

第三冇手尾，要

48191

中文媒體報導：
http://www.upmedia.mg/news_info.php?SerialNo=5223

所以說：
天朝王師撤退神速，南蘇賊寇猶追不及

橫批
保命要緊

[ 本帖最後由 48191 於 10-10-2016 18:41 編輯 ]

Lolanto

引用:

原帖由 48191 於 9-10-2016 09:30 發表
怎麼這份報告和我那份出入那麼大？

唔知你有冇留意到日期，兩份報告講緊兩次唔同件事

Lolanto

引用:

原帖由 FBC1 於 9-10-2016 04:45 發表
維和部隊係好睇,但唔好食.

維和部隊不知幾好食...我指收錢派部隊出去果個 維和部隊同日本自衞隊一樣，啲人當打份工出糧咋∼維和部隊更加唔係保衞自己國家，洗鬼同你賣命

Hamlet

我好奇咁去facebook講既o個份報告睇緊，英文唔好睇得慢唔好見怪。
首先提到老解既係第五頁一段講機步連四級軍士長楊樹鵬同下士李磊殉職既

As fighting intensified on July 10–11, peacekeepers responsible for protecting the POC sites performed
unevenly. Because guard towers along the POC1 perimeter did not have adequate protection from gunfire,
the Chinese peacekeepers there withdrew to ditches and vehicles below. Then, during the early evening
of July 10, a rocket-propelled grenade exploded near a Chinese armored personnel carrier (APC) in POC1,
wounding six peacekeepers. UN House was not equipped with a surgical team or blood bank to provide
appropriate treatment, and UNMISS was unable to negotiate a medical evacuation to the hospital on the
Tongping base, only 15 kilometers away. Two of the peacekeepers died, one after bleeding out without
adequate care for 16 hours. If the protection of civilians is to remain at the heart of modern peacekeeping,
Member States and the UN Departments of Peacekeeping Operations and Field Support need to take
immediate steps to improve medical care and to establish guaranteed standards of medical evacuation in
South Sudan and other locations where peacekeepers are deployed.


跟住就係講話佢地離開陣地後撤入難民營辦公區
POC1 was left increasingly unprotected—a problem that deteriorated in particular after the Chinese
peacekeepers took casualties. First, the pedestrian gate was left open and unguarded; SPLA soldiers could
have walked in unobstructed. Then, as fighting resumed on the morning of July 11, Chinese peacekeepers
abandoned their posts in POC1 entirely, withdrawing into the core UN House base. While fleeing, some
peacekeepers left behind weapons and ammunition that were taken, at least temporarily, by IDP youth. With
nowhere inside POC1 to shelter from gunfire and no protection from the peacekeepers, approximately 5,000
civilians fled over fences and barbed wire into the core UN House base. There, UNMISS forces struggled to
manage the situation. According to seven independent witness accounts, on the morning of July 12, UNMISS
fired tear gas on the civilians with little or no warning.

http://v.ifeng.com/include/exterior.swf?AutoPlay=false&guid=01d7526e-10c2-412c-9e78-3796287f776b

http://video.weibo.com/player/1034:5302a0f56f35b52278a5aefb473218b9/v.swf

[ 本帖最後由 Hamlet 於 11-10-2016 01:17 編輯 ]

Hamlet

The peacekeepers responsible for protecting civilians inside POC3 and Tongping base typically performed
better than those at POC1. Although some Ethiopian troops appear to have withdrawn from their perimeter
positions in POC3, civilians there consistently described how other Ethiopian peacekeepers provided them
with protection by remaining at their perimeter posts, helping evacuate civilian casualties, giving instructions
to civilians on how to take cover from crossfire, and, on at least a few occasions, returning fire when
fighters targeted the camp. At Tongping, where fighting prevented civilians from accessing the compound
gates, Rwandan peacekeepers assisted civilians to enter through the perimeter fence and provided initial
humanitarian assistance, such as medical care, water, and shelter.

下面尼段話老解同埃塞俄比亞部隊拒絕出擊
While the performance of peacekeepers in protecting the POC sites varied, UNMISS’s ability to protect
outside was nonexistent. On the afternoon of July 11, around 80 to 100 SPLA soldiers attacked the Terrain
compound in Juba, where they proceeded to rape and gang rape at least five international aid workers,
physically or sexually assault at least a dozen others, and execute a South Sudanese journalist—apparently
because of his Nuer ethnicity. Several departments within UNMISS received information about the attack
shortly after it began, and orders were given directing a Quick Reaction Force (QRF) to respond. No QRF
ever tried to leave the UN House gates, however, with at least the Chinese and Ethiopian battalions refusing
to go. UNMISS even secured assistance from South Sudanese authorities to help the QRF navigate SPLA
positions on the road, but the contingents still were unwilling to try to intervene.
老解同尼泊爾警察部隊

Even after the ceasefire on July 11, civilians continued to be targeted with violence, without effective
response by UNMISS. Women and girls in particular experienced high levels of sexual violence in the vicinity
of the POC sites, as they were often compelled to leave the sites in order to find food for their families. CIVIC
documented at least one case in which SPLA soldiers abducted a woman in the immediate vicinity of both
an armed Nepalese Formed Police Unit (FPU) sentry post and a Chinese military peacekeeping position in
POC1. Neither group tried to intervene despite being aware that the abduction was taking place.


————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Of the three locations in Juba where peacekeepers were tasked with protecting South Sudanese civilians on
UN bases, the performance appears to have been the worst at UN House’s POC1, where around 8,600 IDPs
live. POC1, handled primarily by Chinese peacekeepers and a Nepalese Formed Police Unit (FPU), sits close
to the main UNMISS offices (see map on page 2), separated by a metal gate as well as a perimeter fence
topped with barbed wire. As fighting intensified on July 10 and 11, many of the peacekeepers abandoned
their posts, eventually even running back into the core UN base area—and instructing IDPs to follow.


————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
講佢地離開崗位
On Sunday, UN House found itself at the center of fighting between the government and opposition.
A dozen IDPs in POC1 described to CIVIC how, as shooting intensified in the vicinity of POC1, Chinese
peacekeepers left the sentry posts along the perimeter. “They abandoned their posts when the fighting got
heavy,” said a 22-year-old male student who lives in POC1. “They came down [from the guard towers] and lay
down. No one was looking outside.”


————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
再次提及炮擊事件
Chinese Peacekeepers Hit by RPG, Temporarily Leave Part of POC1

After coming down from the sentry posts, many Chinese peacekeepers huddled near their armored
personnel carriers (APCs), located at several positions just inside the POC1 perimeter. Around 6:30 p.m. on
Sunday, an RPG fired by fighters outside POC1 exploded near an APC along the northern side of the camp.
An IDP who works for a humanitarian organization inside POC1 described to CIVIC:

I was lying [not far from them], in the same area. The bomb came; it was very terrible. ... Some
[peacekeepers] were inside the vehicle, others were on the ground. … I was lying down [covering my
face] when it hit. When the firing stopped, that’s when I saw [the Chinese peacekeepers]. The injuries
were serious.

Six Chinese peacekeepers were wounded, two of whom ultimately died (see text box on p. 45 on the lack
of medical care and evacuation). Several civilians who were in that part of the POC site told CIVIC that,
after the RPG strike, the other Chinese peacekeepers there left, moving into the areas where IDPs live to
take shelter.

There were conflicting reports both among IDPs in POC1 and UNMISS personnel, but at least some of the
Chinese peacekeepers appear to have returned later that evening to their positions along the northern side
of POC1.
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————


By the morning of July 11, many, if not all, of the
Chinese peacekeepers undoubtedly knew that their
injured fellow soldiers were still trapped at UN House,
unable to get medical care or a medical evacuation.
When heavy fighting restarted in the vicinity of POC1
that morning, the remaining Chinese peacekeepers
fled en masse, running into the core UNMISS base.

“They did not have enough power to defend
themselves, so they evacuated themselves,” said
a 33-year-old IDP in POC1. “On [Monday], all of
them evacuated.” 134 Another IDP, who works for a
humanitarian organization in POC1, told CIVIC: “They
left the POC. Those who were guarding the POC, they left their posts. They went to UN House because it’s
stronger than the POC. … They left their tanks, they left their guns, they left their ammunition—they were just
running. … There were no peacekeepers in the POC.”

[ 本帖最後由 Hamlet 於 11-10-2016 01:40 編輯 ]

loveless

CIVIL份報告84頁，另有365個註解，我都睇咗。
一定要無限簡化的話，我會話睇P.31

另外睇咗好幾個其他source. 似乎由13年政府改變對UN態度開始，每次發生衝突, 各國部隊既反應都係臨陣抽離，與中國無異。正常人係會開始諗，究竟係甘o岩撞正結集125個國家既戰鬥人員，都特別廢，還是UN有某些protocol或立場, 令局面如斯醜怪。

48191

看來UN Peacekeeper已經淪落到做做公關Show。

引用:

原帖由 loveless 於 11-10-2016 01:46 發表
CIVIL份報告84頁，另有365個註解，我都睇咗。
一定要無限簡化的話，我會話睇P.31

另外睇咗好幾個其他source. 似乎由13年政府改變對UN態度開始，每次發生衝突, 各國部隊既反應都係臨陣抽離，與中國無 ...

Ben_9413

引用:

原帖由 48191 於 2016-10-11 10:35 發表
看來UN Peacekeeper已經淪落到做做公關Show。

全部各懷鬼胎

UN 真正身份係少林足球練習賽球證, 若然對住兩隊打到飛起都係無能為力

係堅做o既就玩美佬北極熊果隻, 出正自己牌頭洗鬼幫人作嫁衣裳