faihk

引用:

原帖由 s20061188 於 5-1-2011 21:02 發表
GP $4600做左一堆垃圾
加埋一堆所謂鋼件就賣到甘貴
問題多到我係以下post 35樓講
http://www.civiliangunner.com/cg ... mp;page=3#pid804761

ps 要買GBB千其吾好買GP

所以無論aeg定gbb我都唔仲意gnp, 又貴又唔值又唔係做得好過人...

gbb m4我自己會入手 "我們" !

f22a

引用:

原帖由 Kungz 於 6-1-2011 11:39 發表

據聞係會的，不過不足之處就係槍機唔係全行程…
但係如果可以維持返PDW既水準都好值得買，再大力返少少就仲正喇…

完全同意，
話時話PDW都叫長火啦，
但祇得大約1J力(有點無奈)

odyssey2007

咁各位師兄ksc 既m4 又點呢?
有冇人玩過覺得點?
thanks

stevenyu2000

引用:

原帖由 f22a 於 6-1-2011 12:11 發表


完全同意，
話時話PDW都叫長火啦，
但祇得大約1J力(有點無奈)

Perfect for CQB , I just got the GHK PDW , dropdown to around 0.7J but the path and stable gas use ( no gas explose ) very good .

Good to play in CQB single shoot.

Good choice for rifle type weapon in CQB asI don't like play AEG single shoot in CQB

magus

if u chasing for hi-end operation system of course is western arms but highly recommand dont change the plastic body otherwise your magazine may not fit for the nozzle area again......it will case gas blow-out and effective the magazine tempeture going down......etc