Henry

it's magic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

-l-

引用:

原帖由 14692 於 29-1-2007 08:01 發表

heli用....如果用25mm以下既口徑彈藥攻擊佢, 都係冇用

講真,比着你係裝甲兵/heli乘員,就算個Active Protection system只當到30％o既導彈攻擊,你想吾想要先?[]

ZaMaR

引用:

原帖由 -l- 於 29-1-2007 21:26 發表

講真,比着你係裝甲兵/heli乘員,就算個Active Protection system只當到30％o既導彈攻擊,你想吾想要先?

有好過冇[]

WAIKO01

引用:

原帖由 -l- 於 29-1-2007 07:34 發表

自大(私)的美佬國防部可能不要,因為.......
MSNBC has reported that there is resistance to incorporating TROPHY in the US Army. The U.S. Department of Defense has contracted with Raytheon to develop an equivalent system, which will not be ready before 2011 at the earliest (but now declines to say whether it still is on course to meet that deadline),[1] whereas TROPHY could be deployed much sooner. According to MSNBC's sources, the reason for not adopting TROPHY for now is that it would remove the need for the Raytheon program, causing it to be canceled.
苦了兵哥們

但我相信最後會和ERA的結果一樣[]

14692

好過冇......