發新話題
打印

上車難,是誰的錯?

引用:
原帖由 queen 於 1-2-2011 09:10 發表

居屋...really just a joke only.......don't think the 居屋 can help u to buy a house....

If you know the limit of the apply of the 居屋(I mean the "white form".....you will know....this is 100% a ...
i don't think 居屋 is a joke, esp for those who can't reach the requirement for 公屋, 但又想買樓...
i tell u what, my family used "white form" for application.
though it's 2 decades ago...
anyway, your 100% joke happened on my family.

如果咁既入息供唔到居屋, 咁又點買其他樓呢...

[ 本帖最後由 boni 於 1-2-2011 10:31 編輯 ]

TOP

引用:
原帖由 B20_hk 於 1-2-2011 09:59 發表
我07年7月上車,當年息低價平
07年年尾,已有agent出多一成
今年我樓上個單位己多出我個單位當年售價1/3價錢... ...

我曾經做過2大地產發展商,其中一個最無良
-特大窗台
-最低標嘅contractor(有啲冇 ...
最無良應該係.......長期搵人笨實....??
我一向都係咁諗,經濟係有周期,或突發性事故,只要手頭有充足資金,下次財富轉移(即係個市又跌到趴街)就係受益者
金融海嘯之後其實多左好大批新富豪,有危總有機。
我認同你講中央點都會撐住個市,但問題係撐得幾耐?
內地依家都十個煲九個蓋,間間行都等緊全面開放....一開放我相信下場都係俾人洗乾洗淨...

TOP

引用:
原帖由 boni 於 1-2-2011 10:30 發表

i don't think 居屋 is a joke, esp for those who can't reach the requirement for 公屋, 但又想買樓...
i tell u what, my family used "white form" for application.
though it's 2 decades ago...
anywa ...
2 decades .....
睇唔出你貢大個喎
講真,冇第一間屋仔去第一桶金又點換樓呢?
想當年幾十萬買到居屋既好肯定依家都供完,佢地間屋依家起碼都一百幾十萬...細屋搬大屋呢的係以前政府既政策

TOP

引用:
原帖由 boni 於 1-2-2011 10:30 發表

i don't think 居屋 is a joke, esp for those who can't reach the requirement for 公屋, 但又想買樓...
i tell u what, my family used "white form" for application.
though it's 2 decades ago...
anywa ...
-->2 decades ago<--
is totally different with now la.......in 1990....the price of house is still very reasonable.....and the price of 居屋 is still very low totally different with now...

-->如果咁既入息供唔到居屋, 咁又點買其他樓呢<--

The main point is....the family/people who only have 咁既入息.....really can't buy a house.....

One very interest thing in Hong Kong now.....the people who do not have enough money....why they "must" buy a house????  If really do not have enough money...so...don't buy....this is the rule...

For a very easy and simple example, I also want to buy a SOCOM M200, it need 10K, but I do not have enough money.....so....I can't buy.......this is the rule....

And the org. idea of 居屋, is not for the "white form" people/family, is for the "green form" people/family, it is let the people who live in 公屋, but their income is raise, so they can use the "green form" to apply 居屋, and they do not have limit of their salary, so when they remove from 公屋, some other people can move to their house...it is use to keep the flow of the 公屋, the 居屋 is not help people to 上車.........

[ 本帖最後由 queen 於 1-2-2011 10:49 編輯 ]

TOP

引用:
原帖由 kimkileo 於 1-2-2011 10:44 發表


2 decades .....
睇唔出你貢大個喎
講真,冇第一間屋仔去第一桶金又點換樓呢?
想當年幾十萬買到居屋既好肯定依家都供完,佢地間屋依家起碼都一百幾十萬...細屋搬大屋呢的係以前政府既政策
我諗買居屋既大部份都係自住多過細屋搬大屋...

TOP

引用:
原帖由 queen 於 1-2-2011 10:46 發表


-->2 decades ago如果咁既入息供唔到居屋, 咁又點買其他樓呢
你講既野我明...  
不過我覺得唔應該埋沒居屋既優點

我絕對同意"買樓唔係must"...

TOP

引用:
原帖由 boni 於 1-2-2011 12:18 發表


你講既野我明...  
不過我覺得唔應該埋沒居屋既優點

我絕對同意"買樓唔係must"...
咁買樓唔係must我都好認同既.....

TOP

引用:
原帖由 kimkileo 於 1-2-2011 14:06 發表


咁買樓唔係must我都好認同既.....
如果我可以間租公屋600呎...幾千蚊...我就一定唔買樓
新加坡人人有屋住...邊有人抄樓???

TOP

引用:
原帖由 kimkileo 於 1-2-2011 10:36 發表


最無良應該係.......長期搵人笨實....??
我一向都係咁諗,經濟係有周期,或突發性事故,只要手頭有充足資金,下次財富轉移(即係個市又跌到趴街)就係受益者
金融海嘯之後其實多左好大批新富豪,有危總有機。
我 ...
"手頭充足"又要"看準時機".......
我都希望我係幸運兒...

TOP

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

TOP

引用:
原帖由 於 1-2-2011 16:01 發表

買摟唔係must but有屋住就係...
如何可以人人有屋住又唔推到個樓市??.....我覺得冇可能

TOP

引用:
原帖由 B20_hk 於 1-2-2011 15:56 發表


如果我可以間租公屋600呎...幾千蚊...我就一定唔買樓
新加坡人人有屋住...邊有人抄樓???
講得好啱 政府的政策就是焗你地買樓!
君 不 須 防 人 不 肖 , 眼 前 鬼 卒 皆 為 妖 ;
秦 王 徒 把 長 城 築 , 禍 去 禍 來 因 自 招.
何為邪鬼何為神, 神鬼如何兩不分!
但管信邪修正外, 何愁天地不知聞!
駟馬高車出遠途,今朝赤腳返回廬,
莫非不第人還井,亦似經營乏本歸。

TOP

引用:
原帖由 kimkileo 於 1-2-2011 16:08 發表


如何可以人人有屋住又唔推到個樓市??.....我覺得冇可能
個樓巿又實在太高! 再加上港紙跟美金掛勾扁值, 銀得息口又低, 唔炒埋一份都幾難!
君 不 須 防 人 不 肖 , 眼 前 鬼 卒 皆 為 妖 ;
秦 王 徒 把 長 城 築 , 禍 去 禍 來 因 自 招.
何為邪鬼何為神, 神鬼如何兩不分!
但管信邪修正外, 何愁天地不知聞!
駟馬高車出遠途,今朝赤腳返回廬,
莫非不第人還井,亦似經營乏本歸。

TOP

引用:
原帖由 tango10 於 1-2-2011 16:16 發表

個樓巿又實在太高! 再加上港紙跟美金掛勾扁值, 銀得息口又低, 唔炒埋一份都幾難!
乜都唔做守本份但係睇住自己既銀紙係咁扁值....
定選擇進取的...殺呀.......

TOP

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

TOP

發新話題