Henry

ok, well, perhaps you've done more research on the governmental reports than i have, but here i'll just speak from what i've heard a very very general opinion: the guys love dragon skin

now what the government reports, i guess you know better than i do, but i'm still gonna have to stick to the fact that i've heard everyone talk about how much they want that stuff, and that troop reviews give it an A++


and to the other guy...
a 7.62x51 bullet is generally 168gn
while a .50BMG is usually 649gn or 750gn
are you serious on making body armour for that?

cccarlos

sorry for my nonsense but...
what is gn?

sunny

引用:

原帖由 AJM 於 24-2-2007 01:33 發表
1) I agree with you that the U.S. Government is totally Fxxk Up. They didn't even have enough supplies for their troops in Iraq.

2) For those U.S. military troopers didn't receive a body armo ...

As I remember, every U.S. Military personnel will have a set of standard issue body armor.

sunny

引用:

原帖由 Henry 於 24-2-2007 12:53 發表
ok, well, perhaps you've done more research on the governmental reports than i have, but here i'll just speak from what i've heard a very very general opinion: the guys love dragon skin

now wh ...

I think is pointless to make a body armor that can stop a .50 BMG.  I think u will still get kill from the shock when that slug impact u.

[ 本帖最後由 sunny 於 25-2-2007 01:24 編輯 ]

Henry

well yah, exactly, i mean, according to US regulations (in their law books), you're not even supposed to shoot the .50BMG sniper rifles at people.. it's not considered an anti personnel weapon... thechnically


why would you want kevlar that'd stop a round designed to shoot through tanks? well, sure i'd like that too if it didn't weigh more than i did

WAIKO01

引用:

原帖由 sunny 於 25-2-2007 01:23 發表



I think is pointless to make a body armor that can stop a .50 BMG.  I think u will still get kill from the shock when that slug impact u.

話雖如此,但之前的報導指出龍鱗甲(Dragon Skin)的防破片和7.62的能力比現用中標的好(然而,現在伊拉克有很多受傷也是炸彈破片所至),但是基於成本和因為某些得益者的利益問題而被"幹掉了".

neomarx

whatever what are going to be purchased by the government, it is related to politics, and dirty $$

this is the first golden rule in govenment agencies.

lorddh

I agree too that it has to do with politics. This is the first piece of flexible Lv III armor I know of that is viable on the battlefield. Imagine the political pressure from the soldiers and their families and pesky politicians if PEO Solider or NATICK or whatever agency which is responsible admits that it is better than the interceptor. If I am Pointblank I will use whatever influence I have to delay or even derail the whole testing process on Dragon skin. In fact, the guy responsible for running the initial tests for the army also works as product manager for IBA.........

死肥仔

引用:

原帖由 cccarlos 於 25-2-2007 00:07 發表
sorry for my nonsense but...
what is gn?

gn好似係火藥份量~
500gn=1安士

死肥仔

佢係咪最好我唔知.....但係一定唔洗用個"suck"黎形容e件野......
7.62鋼心......係穿甲的........
如果咁都擋到.....真係有乜好講.....
我諗....真係打仗.......幾可會用鋼心打人.......
又或者咁講......邊有咁多人帶鋼心出去打.......

其實樓主睇完E段片....點會覺得龍皮唔好呢?!

AJM

引用:

原帖由 死肥仔 於 16-3-2007 12:44 發表
佢係咪最好我唔知.....但係一定唔洗用個"suck"黎形容e件野......
7.62鋼心......係穿甲的........
如果咁都擋到.....真係有乜好講.....
我諗....真係打仗.......幾可會用鋼心打人.......
又或者咁 ...

唔係化..... 唔想同你討論。

不如打仗前大家講到明打幾大，唔打7.62鋼心囉。

[ 本帖最後由 AJM 於 16-3-2007 23:03 編輯 ]

死肥仔

引用:

原帖由 AJM 於 16-3-2007 21:07 發表




唔係化..... 唔想同你討論。

不如打仗前大家講到明打幾大，唔打7.62鋼心囉。

但係件龍皮鋼心都擋到啵.....咁有乜問題呢?!
只係好奇睇完果段片.....樓主會得出龍皮"sucks"e個結論.....

[ 本帖最後由 死肥仔 於 17-3-2007 07:48 編輯 ]

AJM

引用:

原帖由 死肥仔 於 17-3-2007 07:47 發表

但係件龍皮鋼心都擋到啵.....咁有乜問題呢?!
只係好奇睇完果段片.....樓主會得出龍皮"sucks"e個結論.....

死肥仔，你睇番我上面出啲posts啦.... |)

Sucks又好，fxxk又好，始終就係無NIJ Level IV standard certificate, 隔籬台都有討論。

[ 本帖最後由 AJM 於 17-3-2007 15:22 編輯 ]

uckelvin

Ha ~   

死肥仔

引用:

原帖由 AJM 於 17-3-2007 15:15 發表





死肥仔，你睇番我上面出啲posts啦.... |)

Sucks又好，fxxk又好，始終就係無NIJ Level IV standard certificate, 隔籬台都有討論。

有睇呀~只係唔明段片不斷唱好~但係你個題目就話佢SUCKS....好似唔係咁岩...哈