Hkpolice-Psu

引用:

原帖由 gtoray 於 12-7-2008 18:00 發表


我想講幾樣o野
spca 唔係一間善堂, 唔好諗住好似 999 咁可以隨傳隋到
養寵物有時代價係好貴的, 責任亦唔細

我明白你ge經歷可能令你好討厭 spca
但係其實都係"電話裡面果條友"ge錯
唔可以一支竹打沉一船人 ...

咁如果自稱係非牟利團體 / 慈善團體 , 理論上都可以叫善堂掛....

咁當然啦, 原來佢地ge宗旨係

The SPCA believes that animals deserve our protection, compassion and respect. We aim to prevent their suffering wherever we can through-

• Collection and rescue of abandoned, sick and injured animals.
• Investigation of complaints of cruelty.
• Acceptance of unwanted pets to ease the stray problem and animal suffering.
• Provision of low-cost desexing for cats and dogs to prevent unwanted litters.
• Rehoming of unwanted pets whenever possible.
• Hospitalization of homeless animals whenever possible, providing as necessary basic veterinary care, treatment of disease or major surgery.
• Public education on responsible pet ownership and animal welfare issues.

從未提及有主人ge佢地會提供協助

gtoray

引用:

原帖由 Hkpolice-Psu 於 12-7-2008 18:16 發表


咁如果自稱係非牟利團體 / 慈善團體 , 理論上都可以叫善堂掛....

善堂係派米ga ma
非牟利團體要收回成本ga~

Hkpolice-Psu

引用:

原帖由 gtoray 於 12-7-2008 18:18 發表



善堂係派米ga ma
非牟利團體要收回成本ga~

咁佢地洗咩要人捐錢姐, 都收到成本囉

gtoray

引用:

原帖由 Hkpolice-Psu 於 12-7-2008 18:20 發表


咁佢地洗咩要人捐錢姐, 都收到成本囉

只係果 part ge成本....而且急診似乎唔係 spca ge 主要目標服務
如果要靠急診收費支持, 咁就 16000 一次都唔掂啦

gtoray

引用:

原帖由 Hkpolice-Psu 於 12-7-2008 18:16 發表


咁如果自稱係非牟利團體 / 慈善團體 , 理論上都可以叫善堂掛....

咁當然啦, 原來佢地ge宗旨係

The SPCA believes that animals deserve our protection, compassion and respect. We aim to preve ...

o岩ga, 所以唔好諗住佢地係 serv 我地(人類)

btw. 佢地係好鼓勵主人為 pets 絕育的

Hkpolice-Psu

引用:

原帖由 gtoray 於 12-7-2008 18:29 發表


只係果 part ge成本....而且急診似乎唔係 spca ge 主要目標服務
如果要靠急診收費支持, 咁就 16000 一次都唔掂啦

原來係咁....

尤果d有主人ge動物死晒佢, 咁就係佢地ge目標, 防止動物被遺棄

真高招!

gtoray

引用:

原帖由 Hkpolice-Psu 於 12-7-2008 18:38 發表


原來係咁....

尤果d有主人ge動物死晒佢, 咁就係佢地ge目標, 防止動物被遺棄

真高招!

講真...唔好將個波推比 spca
你係有好好照顧隻貓咪, 點解佢大肚你都唔知?
你唔想佢有 bb 點解唔幫佢做絕育?
如果你ge方式一直都係天生天養就應該貫徹始終

你係咪真係咁珍惜生命? 我諗唔係lor
$1600 上門睇病, 如果係你自己有病, 你比唔比?

想當年, 我都嫌同隻狗狗 body check 要 $3xxx 而無做
所以唔知道佢已經有大病
到今日, 我都怪責自己

我都唔想再養, 因為我知道自己唔係一個好主人

Hkpolice-Psu

引用:

原帖由 gtoray 於 12-7-2008 18:52 發表


講真...唔好將個波推比 spca
你係有好好照顧隻貓咪, 點解佢大肚你都唔知?
你唔想佢有 bb 點解唔幫佢做絕育?
如果你ge方式一直都係天生天養就應該貫徹始終

你係咪真係咁珍惜生命? 我諗唔係lor
$1600 上門睇 ...

hehe...

你忘記左我同你講過隻貓b我係o係公司執返尼ge, 我公司從來無貓, 係自來的, 點來唔知, 點解無貓媽唔知

我只係好心執佢返尼, 一心諗住佢無人/貓要就我養大佢啦...

gtoray

引用:

原帖由 Hkpolice-Psu 於 12-7-2008 19:07 發表
hehe...

你忘記左我同你講過隻貓b我係o係公司執返尼ge, 我公司從來無貓, 係自來的, 點來唔知, 點解無貓媽唔知

我只係好心執佢返尼, 一心諗住佢無人/貓要就我養大佢啦...

我都知你都係好心ge
如果將來仲會收養流浪貓就要同佢絕育喇
唔係佢出去搞三搞四你就煩啦
一胎幾隻, 唔係貴貓又未必有人要
自己又未必養得咁多

Kane

引用:

原帖由 gtoray 於 12-7-2008 19:12 發表


我都知你都係好心ge
如果將來仲會收養流浪貓就要同佢絕育喇
唔係佢出去搞三搞四你就煩啦
一胎幾隻, 唔係貴貓又未必有人要
自己又未必養得咁多

我一year係街拾過3x 只貓狗
餵貓,捉d流浪貓去desex(<===唔洗錢)
d 洗費我可以起碼買2支ptw

reaper

All i can say is that it is the responsibility of the owner to take care of their pets. Since we did offer our service, I don't really get what's your point for hating SPCA(HK).

So lets say a parent is mistreating his/ her child, and suddenly the child got very sick.
Can he/ she blame the hospital for not being able to save their children?

you do have a kind heart for taking care of the kitties which is very great. On the other hand, they might be still alive if you sent the kitties to a vet for body check after you took them home. Have you ever try to find the cause of death of the 1st kitty to prevent the same thing happening to the 2nd kitty?

We wanted to take care of animals, but we also have limited power and so we ask the owner to consider the consequences before they keep their pet.

Hkpolice-Psu

引用:

原帖由 reaper 於 13-7-2008 15:27 發表
All i can say is that it is the responsibility of the owner to take care of their pets. Since we did offer our service, I don't really get what's your point for hating SPCA(HK).

So lets say a pare ...

如果你要用人來比較就有排講, 有老豆老母果D入AED係1600一次, 無老豆老母果D就有優惠

窮人?咪唔好生仔囉, 係無得俾你醫GE喇, 一係放棄佢, 等佢有都變無老豆老母, 咁咪可以有其他人照顧囉

仲有, 無隻貓ge死亡相差只係數天, 我唔係法醫亦唔係專業獸醫, 我只係憑我人生經驗話俾我知當我認為香港可以幫到我ge機構竟然係咁

咁就唔該佢改名, 應該叫做只保護被放棄動物協會啦

reaper

Did they not perform their duty? I was not asking you to examine the death of your 1st kitty, I was saying that maybe you could have brought the 2nd kitty for a body check after the 1st one died.

What is the purpose of 保良局? Do they not protect children? Try to call 保良局 and say your son is very sick...see what they will tell you. Should they change their name too?

There is a purpose for each organization, you think its fair to blame SPCA(HK) for not doing something that they are responsible for?

香港愛護動物協會原稱香港防止虐畜會，其後改為現時的名稱。在香港主權移交前，該會曾一度有「皇家」的銜頭，稱為皇家香港愛護動物協會。


主要工作
收集及拯救被遺棄的受傷動物。
調查虐待動物的報告。
接收香港市民棄養的動物,以解動物流離之困。
為貓狗提供廉價的絕育手術服務,以避免動物被繁殖後無人願意養育的情況。
為無家可歸的動物尋覓新主人。
盡可能為一些無家可歸的動物提供住院的服務,包括:基本的獸疾護理,治療. 甚至大型手術。


向公眾傳揚"寵物主人應有的責任與動物福利"之訊息。

Rager

引用:

原帖由 reaper 於 15-7-2008 10:15 發表
Did they not perform their duty? I was not asking you to examine the death of your 1st kitty, I was saying that maybe you could have brought the 2nd kitty for a body check after the 1st one died.

...

睇翻psu師兄篇文
再睇下愛護動物協會個宗旨
"寵物主人應有的責任與動物福利"
比個寵物得到INSTANT TREATMENT唔係動物福利?

reaper

引用:

原帖由 Rager 於 15-7-2008 10:34 發表

睇翻psu師兄篇文
再睇下愛護動物協會個宗旨
"寵物主人應有的責任與動物福利"
比個寵物得到INSTANT TREATMENT唔係動物福利?

"佢叫我打去spca, 咁我打左去啦, 跟住同佢講左我有隻貓b, 唔知咩事, 好似就死咁, 咁可以點, 跟住電話裡面果條友就話, 「急診要1600蚊ga wor, 咁你仲睇唔睇呀?!」,語氣帶囂張, 佢咁講一講, 我當時又真係無錢, 諗多兩諗貓b已經唔得了...."

I do understand that the operator might not be very nice...but please also understand that we did offer instant treatment. On the other hand, how do you interpret 寵物主人應有的責任?