發新話題
打印

真係甘神?(馬航事件)

真係甘神?(馬航事件)

吾知真定假,好奇怪...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JpbZZKqxy0

無論如何,希望快D水落石出

[ 本帖最後由 ohnavi 於 11-3-2014 10:16 編輯 ]

TOP

[吹mode] 可能機上有特别乘客,比美佬殺手彗星擊落。。。又或者比潛艇由水㡳發射對空導彈擊中[/吹mode]

講住咁多先。。。。排緊隊精神科覆診

[ 本帖最後由 tango1997 於 11-3-2014 10:45 編輯 ]

TOP

轉貼:
Six important facts you're not being told about lost Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 (脷伸:我聽日去覆診

• Fact #1: All Boeing 777 commercial jets are equipped with black box recorders that can survive any on-board explosion
No explosion from the plane itself can destroy the black box recorders. They are bomb-proof structures that hold digital recordings of cockpit conversations as well as detailed flight data and control surface data.

• Fact #2: All black box recorders transmit locator signals for at least 30 days after falling into the ocean
Yet the black box from this particular incident hasn't been detected at all. That's why investigators are having such trouble finding it. Normally, they only need to "home in" on the black box transmitter signal. But in this case, the absence of a signal means the black box itself -- an object designed to survive powerful explosions -- has either vanished, malfunctioned or been obliterated by some powerful force beyond the worst fears of aircraft design engineers.

• Fact #3: Many parts of destroyed aircraft are naturally bouyant and will float in water
In past cases of aircraft destroyed over the ocean or crashing into the ocean, debris has always been spotted floating on the surface of the water. That's because -- as you may recall from the safety briefing you've learned to ignore -- "your seat cushion may be used as a flotation device."

Yes, seat cushions float. So do many other non-metallic aircraft parts. If Flight 370 was brought down by an explosion of some sort, there would be massive debris floating on the ocean, and that debris would not be difficult to spot. The fact that it has not yet been spotted only adds to the mystery of how Flight 370 appears to have literally vanished from the face of the Earth.

• Fact #4: If a missile destroyed Flight 370, the missile would have left a radar signature
One theory currently circulating on the 'net is that a missile brought down the airliner, somehow blasting the aircraft and all its contents to "s mithereens" -- which means very tiny pieces of matter that are undetectable as debris.

The problem with this theory is that there exists no known ground-to-air or air-to-air missile with such a capability. All known missiles generate tremendous debris when they explode on target. Both the missile and the debris produce very large radar signatures which would be easily visible to both military vessels and air traffic authorities.

• Fact #5: The location of the aircraft when it vanished is not a mystery
Air traffic controllers have full details of almost exactly where the aircraft was at the moment it vanished. They know the location, elevation and airspeed -- three pieces of information which can readily be used to estimate the likely location of debris.

Remember: air safety investigators are not stupid people. They've seen mid-air explosions before, and they know how debris falls. There is already a substantial data set of airline explosions and crashes from which investigators can make well-educated guesses about where debris should be found. And yet, even armed with all this experience and information, they remain totally baffled on what happened to Flight 370.

• Fact #6: If Flight 370 was hijacked, it would not have vanished from radar
Hijacking an airplane does not cause it to simply vanish from radar. Even if transponders are disabled on the aircraft, ground radar can still readily track the location of the aircraft using so-called "passive" radar (classic ground-based radar systems that emit a signal and monitor its reflection).

Thus, the theory that the flight was hijacked makes no sense whatsoever. When planes are hijacked, they do not magically vanish from radar.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/04424 ... .html#ixzz2vcQ171EG

[ 本帖最後由 ohnavi 於 11-3-2014 10:53 編輯 ]

TOP

點解條片冇lock on 飛得好快果架飛機既?

希望事件早日水落石出

TOP

呢單野......真係好迷......
不過....飛機話就話係最安全的交通工具。不過,一有起大事....就多數係無法救回的事故。

師兄們,你們坐飛機時,有無經歷過一些小問題而令你地覺得不安呢?

TOP

最不安都係氣流o者,未到跌氧氣出來的情況

TOP

我試過兩次係比較不安。
一次係由香港直航北海道。
起飛後約兩小時,聞到些燒焦味....跟住係福岡機場急降,機場有十多部消防車等待。
另一次係由東京成田機場回港。起飛後二十分鐘左右,特然有一次約兩三秒的Free Fall,機內好多人叫了出來......
接下來感覺雙機飛得慢左....而且一路震盪.....直至去到接近台灣空域.....隻機至平靜下來........

TOP

最不幸! 最不幸! 就係 Mr. Tom Clancy 仙遊了!  如果唔咪一定有新(Top selling)書睇!

TOP

引用:
原帖由 RCman 於 11-3-2014 12:40 發表
我試過兩次係比較不安。
一次係由香港直航北海道。
起飛後約兩小時,聞到些燒焦味....跟住係福岡機場急降,機場有十多部消防車等待。
另一次係由東京成田機場回港。起飛後二十分鐘左右,特然有一次約兩三秒的Free ...
哇甘真係好驚喎

TOP

巫師協助搜索「航機仍在空中或墮海」

馬航MH370客機失蹤超過三天,多國搜索隊至今仍然茫無頭緒,馬來西亞官員,希望盡快找出航機下落,不惜請來著名巫師協助搜索。

著名巫師伊布拉欣(Ibrahim Mat Zin)應掌管宗教事務的首相署部長嘉米基爾(Jamil Khir Baharom)邀請,昨天抵達吉隆坡國際機場,手持相信是法器的物件,透過靈異力量尋找失蹤飛機所在位置。伊布拉欣在機場入口祈禱後表示,有兩種感覺,認為飛機仍在空中,或者已經墮海,但不會墜落在陸地上。

嘉米基爾表示,現階段非常需要各界協助,即使搜索過程涉及神秘力量,只要方法符合伊斯蘭教義即可。

呢次連巫師都出動?
在空中?二度空間?

[ 本帖最後由 RCman 於 11-3-2014 12:51 編輯 ]

TOP

最不安係氣流。。。。坐左係度等於。。。。任由宰割 。。。係空中。。。感覺好無助!

TOP

入左時光隧道!

TOP

若要附合現有證據,我估:
1.飛機於萬呎上空發生小爆炸,機身有小穿孔,飛機無事但氣壓急跌
2.機師手忙腳亂無通報,飛機急轉彎下急降低空,一為折返,二為客艙加壓,三為借翼地效應延長航程,就算著陸於海亦增加安全係數
3.飛機可能失速或拉起太慢,機身插水,穿孔入水,負浮力大於救生划.整機下沉

由於越,馬防空雷達少而差,缺乏低空補盲,加上事發於兩國識別區邊沿,所以無所發現.

TOP

空爆必有碎片.

不在深海,水壓大會壓碎機身並有碎片

淺海50米左右不透光,水底反射複雜,聲納難以探測.油箱滿且良好,抗住水壓不壓碎

TOP

無奶油喎!。。。。邊皮刀唔睇。。。咁入到中間先目睇?

TOP

發新話題